Friday, 20 September 2024

THE LUCK OF THE IRISH - BRITAIN'S GREATEST MILITARY LEADERS AND LITERARY FIGURES

19 September 2024

We are trying to understand why Irish Protestants should figure so prominently in British military history and the collective Irish in world literature.

My blog posts may seem to be of random origin, but in fact they are inspired by the scattered remarks of the readership. So today we will continue this great tradition with an attempt to explain why so many of Britain's greatest generals have been of  Protestant Irish stock, and make an attempt to understand why Irish writers have been amongst the greatest in the world. 

Background in the colonisation of Ireland


By way of background, recall the Protestant Reformation in 1517 when Martin Luther famously nailed his 95 Theses to the door of a church in Germany. The Reformation spread across Europe, challenging the authority of the Catholic Church everywhere.

In England, the Reformation took hold under Henry VIII in the 1530s, following the break with the Catholic Church over his divorce and his establishment of the Church of England (the Anglican Church), in other words is rejection of the power of the Pope who could make and break rulers in those days.

Henry VIII's break with the Catholic Church marked the beginning of attempts to assert stronger English control over Ireland. His government began confiscating lands from rebellious Irish lords and redistributing them to English settlers in what were called "plantations".

Then under Queen Elizabeth I, the process of colonisation intensified with several plantations being established in the 1560s and 1570s, particularly in Munster and Laois-Offaly. Protestant settlers from England and Scotland were given land confiscated from native Irish Catholics who had rebelled against English rule.

After the defeat of Irish chieftains in the Nine Years’ War (1594–1603), King James I began the Ulster Plantation in 1609, a large-scale colonisation project marking a major demographic and religious shift in the north of Ireland.

The English Crown had embraced Protestantism and sought to weaken Catholic influence in Ireland, seen as a threat to English rule and secure a loyal population in place of the frequent rebellions against English authority. These Protestant settlers were promised land, economic opportunities, and a chance to establish themselves as a ruling class in Ireland, making plantations attractive to many English and Scottish Protestants.

The plantations and the influx of Protestant settlers only led to centuries of tensions between the native Irish Catholics and the new Protestant settlers.

Perhaps the most brutal of repressions, and one that has never been forgotten, was Oliver Cromwell’s campaign, with many of his soldiers receiving land as payment, reinforcing the Protestant presence.

So, the Protestant Reformation in the early 16th century set the stage for the later Protestant settlements - "plantations" - when successive English monarchs sought to consolidate power in Ireland by establishing Protestant settlements. From this history of conflict arose the tradition of great British generals of Protestant Irish extraction.

Great English military leaders

Of course the English when they think of their great military leaders, think of Horatio Nelson, Montgomery, John Churchill Duke of Marlborough (War of Spanish Succession), Robert Clive of India, Douglas Haig, Admiral John Jellicoe (Commander of the British Grand Fleet in World War I).

       the Duke of Wellington at Waterloo

Great Protestant Irish military leaders

But interestingly, history records that the greatest of British generals as for some strange reason being of Protestant Irish extraction - Arthur Wellesley the Duke of Wellington, Lord Kitchener, Henry Wilson World War I strategist, Charles Cornwallis who led British forces during the American War of Independence, Frederick Roberts 1st Earl Roberts of Anglo-Afghan War fame, Sir George White of Ladysmith.

 Lord Kitchener says your country needs you

That military tradition of Protestant Irish serving in the British Army began in the 17th century, particularly with the Williamite Wars in Ireland (1688–1691). These conflicts pitted Protestant supporters of William of Orange against the Catholic forces of King James II. Many Protestant Irish saw military service as a way to secure land, wealth, and status under the British Crown. Over time, Protestant Irish families continued to serve in British military campaigns, reinforcing this tradition across generations, especially in the context of the British Empire.

Great Irish poets
Let's run through some of the best known...

William Butler Yeats (1865–1939)

One of the most celebrated Irish poets, Yeats was a key figure in both Irish literature and politics, winning the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1923. His works often reflect Irish mythology, history, and the supernatural.

Jonathan Swift (1667–1745)

Best known for Gulliver’s Travels, Swift was also a talented satirist and poet, writing witty verse that critiqued politics and society in Ireland and England.

Thomas Moore (1779–1852)

Famous for his Irish Melodies, Moore was a poet, songwriter, and lyricist whose work captured the spirit of Irish nationalism and romanticism.

James Clarence Mangan (1803–1849)

A significant figure in Irish literature, Mangan's poetry often focused on themes of Irish history, melancholy, and mysticism.

Patrick Kavanagh (1904–1967)

Kavanagh's poetry is noted for its rural realism and portrayal of ordinary life in Ireland. His most famous works include The Great Hunger and On Raglan Road.

Louis MacNeice (1907–1963)

Part of the generation of poets that included W.H. Auden, MacNeice’s work often dealt with themes of politics, war, and Irish identity. His Autumn Journal is widely acclaimed.

Seamus Heaney (1939–2013)

Widely regarded as one of the greatest poets of the 20th century, Heaney won the Nobel Prize in 1995. His works, such as Death of a Naturalist and North, reflect Irish history, rural life, and the Troubles.

Eavan Boland (1944–2020)

Boland's poetry focused on Irish history, womanhood, and the role of women in Irish society. Her works such as In Her Own Image are celebrated for their feminist themes.

Derek Mahon (1941–2020)

Mahon’s poetry explored Irish history, exile, and the challenges of modern life. His A Disused Shed in Co. Wexford is considered one of the finest poems of contemporary Irish literature.

Paul Muldoon (1951–)

A major figure in contemporary poetry, Muldoon’s work is known for its wit, linguistic playfulness, and deep engagement with Irish history. He won the Pulitzer Prize for Poetry in 2003. 

Why this tradition in the British military

There are several possible factors  at work here, within this hiztory of colonisation:

1. Social Mobility: Protestant Irish often found military careers to be one of the few avenues for upward social mobility within the British Empire.

2. Cultural Identity: As Protestants, they were more integrated into British institutions, allowing them to rise in the ranks.

3. Geopolitical Ties: With Ireland being a part of the British Empire, ambitious Irish Protestants often aligned their loyalties with the British Crown.

4. Military Tradition: There was as we have seens, a long history of Protestant Irish serving in the British Army, which became a tradition across generations.

5. The Irish Perspective

Historically, many Irish people, like others facing hardship, were concerned with survival, their future, and their prospects for wealth. Over time, some may have developed a feeling of inferiority when comparing themselves to the English, and would have sought to distance themselves from their Irish identity once they'd picked up an English dialect.

This phenomenon was common in many Irish families. While some embraced their heritage with pride, others were eager to align themselves with Scottish or English roots, sometimes downplaying their Irish background.

6. Mercenary Spirit

The stereotype of the Irish being impoverished, resentful, and aggressive has fed into the notion that they made ideal mercenaries. There’s an unkind view that the brightest Irish left for America, the UK, or other places to find prosperity, leaving behind those who perpetuated the stereotype of the "dim-witted Paddy." This perspective, while popular, is deeply unfair and overlooks the complexities of Ireland’s history and the resilience of its people.

Final Thoughts

The history of the Irish diaspora and the experiences of those who remained in Ireland is complex, with many individuals navigating their identity and circumstances in different ways. Simplistic stereotypes fail to capture the diversity and depth of these experiences.

This article has discussed the significance of Irish Protestant leaders in British military history, emphasising their historical role within the British Empire. 

Following the colonisation of Ireland by England, the Protestant Anglo-Irish population gained substantial political and military opportunities, becoming integral to British imperial expansion. 

Their military prominence stemmed from their Protestant status, which aligned them with British colonial interests, providing paths to leadership. Military service became a family tradition among the Anglo-Irish elite, often starting with education in military schools, leading to significant roles in British military campaigns across Europe and beyond. This social and political alignment helped cement a long tradition of Anglo-Irish contributions to British military success. 

Leaders like the Duke of Wellington and Lord Kitchener exemplify this trend. This military culture became a point of pride and identity for many Anglo-Irish families, passing from generation to generation, and continuing to influence British military circles for centuries. Ultimately, this history reflects the broader colonial relationship between Ireland and Britain, where Protestant Irish leaders found their place in the British Empire's power structure.

Now let's turn to a parallel understanding of what makes Irish literature so appreciated on the world stage.

Why this literary tradition?

Take Mahon for an example. Mahon’s (1941–2020) poetry explores Irish history, exile, and the challenges of modern life. His 'A Disused Shed in Co. Wexford' is a bit weird, but is considered one of the finest poems of contemporary Irish literature apparently.

Or Paul Muldoon (1951–). A major figure in contemporary poetry, his work is known for its wit, linguistic playfulness "Life is a misprint in the sentence of death", and deep engagement with Irish history. He won the Pulitzer Prize for Poetry in 2003.

So same question as for military success - how to explain the success of the Irish on the world literary stage?

From the stories of goblins etc I imagine there is a rich oral story telling tradition and as the best are selected and refined this is going to create a lot of rich mythical material for publication.

To anyone who used to teach English or speak two languages, there is a tendency to see things in language terms and what better medium than poetry. For example, there's a huge Irish diaspora, so presumably Irish writers have a world audience for their ideas, a world public that includes impressionable students. A world English-speaking audience. 

Most of the Catholic Irish are bilingual and if you've always got words fighting for attention then this tends to bring out puns and in general a sense of humour, as opposite ideas meet and clash and surprise; plus the influence of a second language on the first tends to give a recognisably different linguistic style, an all-Irish style in this case, to the writing. 

But beyond the linguistics is the content. As the first people to be colonised, not just do the Irish have a world English-speaking audience for a peculiar style, but also they've got something to talk about that much of the colonised can warm to - the Irish are best placed to develop and understand and talk about themes of exile, rebellion, oppression and identity...we're all interested in this subject: "who am I?", "where am I from?", " what am I doing here?".

The depth of religious faith too, until recently at least, must also provoke deep thinking and philosophical points of view on subjects like existence and morality and universal connection. There's yet another rendering of "waiting for godot" opening on the West End. Hundreds of years of oppression, famine and internal and external unrest, must give the Irish a sense of "the eternal outsider" to muse on the meaning of existence, going back to Beckett and the 1950s.

So anyway, the success of Irish writers on the world literary scene needs explaining and what makes them different seems to come from their linguistics, history and culture. It gives them the ability to capture a world audience with themes we can all relate to. 

Tuesday, 17 September 2024

ANOTHER ATTEMPT ON THE LIFE OF CANDIDATE TRUMP

17 September 2024
What do you make of the recent attempt on the life of Trump? It seems to me that it is the result of the campaign against him in the media, which is stiring up and exciting all the easily-influenced people who might have some problem themselves and with Trump. This guy evidently thinks that Trump will be bad for Ukraine, which is his hobby horse.

It's so typical of a bureaucracy that they allow their rules and protocols to get in the way of common sense. It's obvious that they should not decide the level of security to provide as a function of the status of the individual, they should provide security according to the level of the threat. This would mean Trump would have at least the same protection as the current president.
It's hard to imagine what state America would be left in after the people had expressed their anger, were one of the assassins to be successful.

Monday, 16 September 2024

ECONOMIC MIGRATION FROM KENYA TO GERMANY

16 September 2024

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2024/09/germany-opens-doors-to-250000-kenyan-workers/


FRAME

1. Let’s take the French interpretation of liberal democracy as a guide: Liberty - Equality – Fraternity, to give us a reference frame for understanding and appraisal, why not.


2. This is a deal made from the work of economists and model-makers, so you can be sure it will never work out as planned -  what might go wrong? where is the risk analysis?


3. I understand that every country should pay off its debt, live within its means and improve its productivity, but this is a purely economic model and this is a purely economic deal - this is the "Liberty" part. What about the political and social dimensions – the “Equality” and “Fraternity” parts?


PROBLEMS

1. Germany is facing a labour shortage that threatens its economic stability, particularly in industries like healthcare, engineering, and technology.

2. Kenya is a fast growing country that has yet to organise itself properly. This shows in corruption and electoral fraud, social conflict from 18% unemployment, poverty, land disputes especially in the Rift Valley best known for safari, tribalism there are 20 main tribes and massive gender inequality a warning as to the attitudes of these male migrants, but not religious conflict it seems - Kenya is 70% Protestant, 20% Catholic, 10% Muslim. 

"SOLUTION"

1. The recent deal signed with Kenya allows 250,000 skilled and semi-skilled workers to migrate to Germany helping its problem of skills shortages.

2. Kenya gets employment opportunities for its youth, half the pop.n is under 25 and at least a fifth unemployed. There's a huge informal sector, estimated at a staggering 80% of the economy, hence why Germany will take unqualified IT specialists.

3. It also transfers the problem of an inadequate education system to Germany.

CRITIQUE

1. This deal is most likely the result of years of study and negotiation and I wonder in the first place whether it takes account of the reality of the much-degraded German economy today.

2. Having said that, Germany has a lot of experience from draining the talent of EU countries.

3. The bit about returning illegals is probably just a sweetener for the public.

4. Pending restructuring of its political economic and social systems, it probably suits the Kenyan leadership to bus out the most able and doubtless radical of its youth whose education is unmatched to job availability, leaving the remainder I should think to run the tourism and hospitality sector. There is "Silicone Savannah" strung out on the new Chinese-built highway between Nairobi and Mombasa, but it offer too few opportunities to the graduate class.

5. All this is technical stuff but surely the main problem is, it doesn't take account of the feelings of the German public post 2015. And nor do the models take account of the future needs of the Kenyan economy.

RADICAL ALTERNATIVE

1. Germany is grappling with an ageing population and declining birth rates, its need for foreign labour is undeniable. But without "fair trade" and without addressing the concerns of the peoples of Europe on immigration and integration, what is best for the economy according to the technocrats, might be at odds with the wishes of the people. The rise of the AfD with the possibility of an eventual day of reckoning is evidence of this gulf between elite and people.

2. A sustainable deal that is in the long-term interests of the peoples of both countries would take account of equality and justice, within and between countries (Equality), and take account of the wishes of the host population (Fraternity).

3. What Germany could do is take the unqualified but experienced in the healthcare, engineering and technology sectors, on 2 to 5 year work visas with 90-day location reporting and position chipset inserted in jugular to check you've read this far, do vocational training on them and put them into productive positions ... but then at the end of their mission return them to Kenya, no ifs no buts (as in the ME).


             AND EUROPE WILL RISE AGAIN

Sunday, 15 September 2024

PROPAGANDA FIT FOR THE EDINBURGH FRINGE

15 September 2024
Some interesting points on developments in this war....or if you prefer, the propaganda that would go down better at the Edinburgh Fringe:

Well, firstly to restate : it is not a war in the sense of one people against another, it is an operation to prevent Ukraine joining NATO on grounds of national security, provoked by the continuing attacks on Russian people in the Donbas. And this means squashing the Ukrainian army and replacing the regime in Kiev ( which came to power as a result of a coup in 2014 and whose mandate under the Constitution of Ukraine ran out both president and Parliament earlier this year ) - so not a war against the Ukrainian people, just their leadership and now increasingly obvious that it is a war Russia against NATO.

Back onto some more specific points ...

I notice that Europe is saying it needs permission from America to send these long range missiles (up to 300 kilometers) into Russian territory because the missiles contain component parts made in America, but we know that this is not the reason at all. The reason is that America is controlling the strategy and providing the data from its satellites, and that specialist operators from Britain and France are needed to launch the missiles. So attention The Propaganda - this is not about use of proprietary components or getting software codes, this is about coordinating the direction of the war.

Plus, we should not lose sight of the American purpose which is to weaken Russia through escalation and eventually the Federation should explode into ethnic pieces, much like the Soviet Union collapsed. This is why there are gradual crossings of apparent American red lines. First it was tanks, then it was etc etc now it is F-16s and soon these long range missiles. The missiles available are too few to make any difference to the course of the war and is it worth the West risking its very existence (Putin has said striking the Russian Homeland would be an act of War) for this? The American strategy is escalation to weaken and eventually collapse Russia and I would add then to pillage its resources. Just talking...

Next point. European leaders are asking why they cannot attack Russian territory and why Poland cannot destroy incoming Russian missiles near its border, but without admitting that such behaviour would be to bring NATO and America into direct confrontation with Russia and thus (undeclared) war with a nuclear armed super power (though Putin said this week that this an act of war). Attention this kind of thinking which seems emotional, irrational and delusional ... does Europe really want to be at war with Russia? The UK too is not that far away and should be more cautious in its attempt to extinguish its neighbour.

Zielinsky is asking why it is that America can and Israel can launch missiles into Lebanon and conduct operations in Syria and assassinate leaders in Iran, while it, Ukraine, cannot; without acknowledging that Russia is a military superpower, armed with nuclear weapons; whilst of course the only nuclear power in the middle east is Israel. Again this is not strategic thinking, not taking account of realities, this is just emotional wishful thinking. Also, we need to recognise that even if nuclear is taken off the table, America and NATO still cannot defeat Russia, particularly as Russia is now supported by China (America is now accusing China not just of supplying components but of supplying entire lethal weapons to Russia, it seems).

The people asking these questions - journalists and European leaders - when I watch and listen to them, seem to be increasingly agitated. I get the impression that when they want to counter attack from Poland and want to invade Russia, it is because they feel that Ukraine is a slick of territory that is evaporating under Russian fire and they feel cornered, like wild animals trapped in a forest fire ... refusing to acknowledge that it was they who started the Fire!

 (Recap : U.S. Secretary of State James Baker's famous "not one inch east-ward" assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9 1990, declaration by President Clinton in 1994 that NATO would expand into the buffer zone left by the Soviet collapse, the declaration at the NATO summit in 2008 that Ukraine and Georgia would join NATO, the Maidan coup of 2014, the Minsk agreements of 2014 & 15 that were not implemented, the Rand strategy document RAND_RR3063.pdf of 2019, Putin's warning and peace proposal of 21 December 2021, the SMO of 24 February 2022 and Russia's immediate retreat from Kiev for negotiations which were initialed between the parties, but cancelled by Boris Johnson in April 2022.)

So if China is really now in the direct supply of finished equipment, it will suffer further sanctions beyond those of the commercial war between America and Russia. We can see that this is now taking the shape of a world war, though there is no direct military confrontation as yet and war has not been officially declared.

The Kursk incursion or invasion is described as a "bold initiative" which has "put heart into the Ukrainian army", but at some point The Propaganda will die down and it will be recognised that just as with Napoleon's and Hitler's armies (the two invasions we remember, out of 52), this incursion will be repelled. The Russians have killed thousands of Ukraine's best troops, troops Ukraine transferred off the important frontline in Donbas, speeding up its collapse, and it is a sorry and ragged crew that limps back over the border. Zelinsky is now making out that the purpose was so that Russia and its people should "feel the war" (a very Slavic instinct, I am told), but we know that it has only reinforced Russian feelings against Kiev and illustrated the reality of Ukraine's weakness. 

Perhaps the most daring (and amusing) of the propaganda stories is how certain defend the universal corruption for which Ukraine is famous, as being an inheritance from the days of Russian control when corruption - the line goes - "was a form of civil disobedience"... you've got to laugh! 

Another amusing recasting of reality is to claim that Zielinsky has created an effective war economy, never mind that it only survives thanks to monetary transfusion from the West.

And another recast (spin) is the explanation for the difference between the poor Ukrainians who are sent to the front line and the cafe-society that flourishes amongst the rich in Kiev. We are told that everyone plays their part - the poor die on the front line, while the rich knit bonnets and send food parcels ... you've really got to laugh at that one, if it wasn't so sad!! The flower of Ukraine's youth has been chopped down by at least half a million dead and wounded and many millions have left irrevocably this, the poorest of European countries.

As to the F-16s, the explanation for why they don't fly is not for fear of being shot down, no no, it is that they fly but they must keep hidden from the Russia Force, so no one sees them and especially they are never seen taking off or landing.

And Ukraine will build one million drones this year in the new factories on its territory.

Anyway, I could go on, but I'd be surprised if you have read this far ... just to say that the propaganda would go down better at the Edinburgh Fringe.