Monday, 12 February 2024

CARSON'S TAKE ON RUSSOPHOBIA

13 February 2024


https://www.youtube.com/live/h2xa7hHMUho?si=tAwlIMWxvyOzBQhV

At offset 12'30", Carson offers his explanation for Russophobia. It is very simple: 

the American foreign policy establishment draws its conclusions on Russia's intentions entirely from a two-year period in the late 1930s with the personalities Chamberlain and Churchill and Hitler, 


and they have convinced themselves that Vladimir Putin intends to take over Poland.

This in spite of everything Putin has said since he came to power 24 years ago; 

and the observation that Russia is the largest country in the world, it is very diverse ethnically and culturally, it is Independent in terms of resources, so Putin has enough on his plate managing that country 

and there is nothing in Poland that Putin could want.

This didn't stop Kamala Harris at the 2022 Munich Security Conference in February openly inviting Zelinsky to join NATO which is saying "why don't you let us put nuclear weapons on Russia's border".

TUCKER CARLSON INTERVIEWS VLADIMIR PUTIN - THE HISTORY OF UKRAINE

12 February 2024

https://youtu.be/fOCWBhuDdDo?si=_GCQ0TuhbdI8Q5Vj

Putin's historical account in the interview gives us a detailed narrative on the history of Russia and Ukraine, emphasising the deep-rooted connections as well as the conflicts over the centuries. Here is a summarised chronological account based on the dates he mentioned:

1. **862**: The establishment of Russian statehood is considered to start with the invitation of the Varangian prince Rurik to rule, marking the beginning of centralised Russian statehood.

2. **882**: Prince Oleg, Rurik’s successor, captures Kiev, integrating it and other territories into the state, signaling the development of a unified Russian state with two power centres: Kiev and Novgorod.

3. **988**: The baptism of Russia under Prince Vladimir the Great, adopting the Christian Orthodox religion, significantly strengthens the centralised Russian state due to its unification under one single faith.

4. **13th Century**: The fragmentation of Russian statehood occurs, leading to vulnerability and eventual subjugation by the Mongol Empire under Batu Khan. This period sees the southern Russian cities, including Kiev, losing independence.

5. **1654**: The Treaty of Pereyaslav, where parts of Ukraine under Polish control sought the protection of Moscow, leading to a war with Poland and the eventual integration of these lands into the Russian state.

6. **18th Century**: Under Catherine the Great, Russia expands, reclaiming historical lands, including parts of modern Ukraine.

7. **1917**: Post-Revolution, the Bolsheviks aim to restore Russian statehood, resulting in civil war and conflicts with Poland. The Soviet Union is established, including Ukraine as one of its republics, with territories added that had never been part of historical Ukraine.

8. **1922**: The USSR formation includes Ukraine as a constituent republic with significant territorial gifts from Russia, which had never historically been Ukrainian.

9. **World War II**: The collaboration of some Ukrainian nationalists with Nazi Germany and the subsequent re-integration of western Ukrainian territories into the Soviet Union post-war.

10. **1991**: The dissolution of the USSR and Ukraine's declaration of independence, where Ukraine was recognised within its Soviet-era borders, including territories gifted during the Soviet period.

[No explicit mention, still less explanation of, Kruschev's giving the former Khanate of Crimea to Ukraine.]

Putin emphasises the long history of shared culture, religion, and governance between Russia and Ukraine, viewing modern Ukraine as a product of historical processes influenced significantly by Soviet policies and external pressures. He argues that the contemporary conflict stems from these deep historical roots and the recent geopolitical maneuvers, particularly NATO's eastward expansion due to, in his view, America's fear of Russia, a super-size state with a large population and self-sufficient in resources.

Thursday, 8 February 2024

HOW TRANS-PEOPLE CAN FREE THEMSELVES FROM POPULAR PREJUDICE

8 February 2024



LINK

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/07/another-pillar-of-queen-nicolas-woke-legacy-has-crumbled/

SUMMARY

The SNP government, known for supporting trans rights, acknowledges unintended negative consequences in allowing patients to change their sex on medical records. 

This draft policy questions the trans-inclusive approach and highlights clinical risks, emphasising the importance of considering biological and medical realities over ideology. 

The article criticises Nicola Sturgeon's commitment to trans ideology, citing potential health risks and a tangled political situation in Scotland. The shift in the Scottish medical establishment's stance is seen as a belated acknowledgment of the flaws in the previous approach.

CRIT

Basically, it is Liberalism gone mad, it is the idea that it should not be possible to box you into a category, you are free to be whatever you want to be.

So people who think that trans women are not women are stating a biological fact, but not a what you might call "mental-construct" or “lived identity” fact as you are free to construct - and impose on others - your vision of your own identity.

Racism, sexism, orientation, trans-humanism (eg Elon's integrating AI) ... trans is a category that recognises how biological sex limits the possibilities for self-realisation.

CONCLUSION

That's the ideology and for me that's fine but, obviously (to me, if not them) outside social relations, it is not helpful, dangerous.

REFLECTIONS

The DT could present things more calmly and objectively, use moderate language instead of this MSM "sensationalism".

Sensationalism is about the role of entertaining the readers, but there's also a role to inform and educate and promote understanding and tolerance.


FULL ARTICLE

Another pillar of Queen Nicola’s woke legacy has crumbled


None of her mistakes can compete with her insistence that transwomen are women. Facts were always going to catch up and overtake ideology

The SNP government, having earned a reputation as the UK’s most enthusiastic proposer of trans rights has now conceded that there could be a fatal weakness in allowing patients to change their sex on medical records.

The latest announcement from the Department for the Bleedin’ Obvious comes in the form of a draft policy that admits to “unintended negative consequences” of a trans-inclusive policy, which allows patients to wipe references to their biological sex and instead be recognised in line with their gender identity. 

It’s the final nail in the coffin for what is left of NS's legacy. So committed was the former first minister to trans ideology that she pressed ahead with the Gender Recognition Reform Act (GRRA) in 2022, allowing under-18s to change their legal gender, and opening the door to anyone, whether or not they suffered from gender dysphoria, to self-identify as their preferred gender after only three months and without the approval of a GP.

The debate inside the Holyrood chamber was less heated than that outside, where concerns about the Act’s impact on women’s rights were airily dismissed by MSPs and women’s groups were smeared as transphobic. Even the shocking case of double rapist Isla Bryson could not persuade Sturgeon that transwomen were anything other than actual women

Until now, the devolved administration has insisted that altering a trans patient’s medical records to reflect their “lived identity” has led to “improved patient experience” and “enables better healthcare planning”.

Perhaps the conclusions of her own former officials will persuade Sturgeon and her successor to acknowledge that biological and medical realities should trump ideology.

The proposed new guidelines acknowledge a “clinical risk” if medical staff are kept in the dark about a patient’s birth sex. It warns that some medical tests could be misread and incorrect treatments given as a result.

“The classic example of where this could create a problem is in haemoglobin, where abnormal readings can be a red flag for cancer,” one clinician working in Scotland told The Telegraph.

“The healthy ranges are different for men and women, so if it is assumed a sample has come from a male when in fact it’s from a female, really vital information could be missed.”

It might also be pointed out that a transwoman, who is biologically male, might evade the necessity of regular health checks on her prostate if doctors accept her stated sex at birth as accurate.

The SNP have created a tangled political mess north of the border with their unnecessary – and unnecessarily aggressive – stance on trans rights. Having recognised the unexpected support of the Scottish public for the UK government’s unprecedented decision to prevent the GRRA receiving Royal Assent, Sturgeon resigned from office a year ago. But her successor, Humza Yousaf, quickly fell foul of the same issue. Perhaps seeing the veto more as a constitutional outrage than as a purely policy issue, he insisted on pursuing legal action to overturn it. He failed and is being forced to pay costs to the UK government.

It’s reassuring to see the Scottish medical establishment finally offering some home truths that undermine an ideology that is detrimental to trans people themselves. But why did it take them so long?

Nicola Sturgeon’s toxic legacy will take many years to escape. But none of her mistakes in office can compete with the hubristic, life-threatening insistence that transwomen are women. Facts were always going to catch up and overtake ideology; the question is, how many lives have been adversely affected in the meantime?

Saturday, 3 February 2024

A HATE CRIME TOO FAR

3 February 2024

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/02/football-fan-banned-gender-critical-posts-permier-league/

FIRST REACTION

This is absolutely appalling. These are people who would call themselves Liberal Democrats but in fact they are fascists.

ON MATURE PHILO REFLECTION

We have to understand two things, the first of which is pretty hard to follow and the second to accept.

THE WAR ON INTOLERANCE

Do you remember the war on Racism? the idea that you should be free to be what you want, irrespective of your skin colour. Okay everyone follows that. 
Then came the war on sexism, specifically women should not be discriminated against particularly in the workplace just because they are women. 
After racism and sexism came sexual orientation. You could not discriminate against a person because of their sexual orientation. And we got the lgptq+ movement. 
Finally we have a very strange movement where people should not be discriminated against because they are human beings - this is called post-humanism or trans-humanism and it's a weird one!

Basically it is Liberalism gone mad, it is the idea that it should not be possible to box you into a category, you are free to be whatever you want to be.
So people who think that trans women are not women are stating a biological fact, but not a what you might call "mental-construct" or “lived identity” fact ( I don't know the name given in philosophy to this particular branch of thought) as you are free to construct - and impose on others - your vision of your own identity.

Now the bit that we don't like.

THE WAR ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

Okay, let all these people escape from their category - black, woman, gay++, human - let them dream, dream on, no problem. 
But what we *don't* like is that if anyone who wakes them from this dream by pointing out the obvious - "you are biologically a man" - is committing what looks to be a criminal offence and accountable to the police and even through the courts for this disrespect.

The irony is that it runs contrary to the idea of liberalism in the first place! The basic idea of liberalism is that you should be free to disagree, freedom of expression!!!

And as the lady in the DT piece says, it is all a distraction from the real problems the police should be dealing with, such as knife crime; to which I would add debt, war, inequality...

Friday, 2 February 2024

EUROPE IS IN A DOOM LOOP

1 February 2024

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/01/31/europe-is-finished-condemned-third-rate-elites/

SUMMARY


Allister Heath mourns the demise of Europe, citing economic failure, geopolitical irrelevance, migration crises, and democratic deficits. He suggests Europe's decline is irreversible due to ingrained issues like welfarism, decadence, and self-hatred.

"... the doom-loop is unstoppable."

He argues that young Europeans would fare better in the U.S., emphasising higher living standards, lower taxes, and a more vibrant spirit. Additionally, he criticises Europe's political, economic, and demographic challenges, asserting that even Brexit failed to diagnose and prompt necessary changes.

The piece concludes by cautioning against realigning with Europe, emphasising the continent's accelerating decline and asking,

"How can further increasing our ties with a zero-growth continent or a shrinking German economy do anything for Britain? It can't. And how will the British Left respond to the rise of the far Right in Europe?"

CRIT

1. The EU was working fine when it was a partnership between equals, France and Germany. After the "trente glorieuses", the 30 boom years from World War II to the oil price hike in 1973, Germany moved ahead.

2. The Cold War was a time when the West could probably have bumped off Russia. Putin came to power in 1999 with objective to end the chaos and introduce order.

3. Helmut Kohl was Chancellor during the Cold War to 1998 and saw through German reunification in 1990. After the breakup of the Soviet Union, he spotted the opportunity to take on board all those former Soviet countries and use them as Germany's supply chain. Meaning what had been the West-East German-French Alliance then switched to a North-South - this further damaged France, the alliance and the EU. The euro was another great win for Germany, getting stronger and stronger, worrisome for America.

4. Amongst many achievements, the next Chancellor, Gerhard Schroder, came up with the brilliant plan of using Russia for energy, America for defence and China for commerce. He also notably opposed the 2003 American Intervention in Iraq.

5. From de Gaulle to Mitterand, France had an independent defense policy and this meant it had its own armaments industry and could very easily have been the birthplace of European military independence from America, but instead has only been able to export outside Europe, in competition with other arms suppliers. By buying American, Germany put a stop to a nascent EU army

6. You can imagine the net result of all this on American fears for its hegemony. Since the last world war, the Democrats have always wanted to destroy Russia and with Ukraine And the promise of NATO Membership dating back to 2008, they created the perfect opportunity. Plus the pipeline and the consequences for American LNG and energy prices for Germany. And the Inflation Reduction Act which is sucking the talent and industry out of Europe, especially Germany.

7. Allister Heath blames the doom loop on mediocre European politicians, but I would put the blame very squarely on American foreign policy.

8. America wanting to kill Russia, or at least the Democrats wanting to kill Russia (the Republicans seem more in favour of making friends and avoiding war - this was completely and deliberately misunderstood in Trump's approaches to Russia), before tackling China; and also wanting to prevent a Germany-Russia tie-up ; and weaken Europe (the EU) generally, which means weakening Germany.

9. Cameron, the new pom-pom girl replacing Boris, must delight America, but this doesn't stop America from wounding the UK by refusing a trade deal. Further proof of American strategy to destroy Russia; weaken Europe, Germany in particular; and prevent a German Russia tie up.

ARTICLE

(For those like me without a subscription.)

In summary, Allister Heath says it's time to mourn the demise of old Europe. The rot is too far gone, the decline too pronounced, the welfarism, decadence, pacifism and self-hatred too ingrained, the doom-loop unstoppable. Once the world's richest, most advanced continent, Europe is finished, its humiliating fall all too obvious to the rest of the world, if not to deluded Europeans.

Its self-inflicted pathologies - catastrophic economic failure, near-total geopolitical irrelevance, a migration and integration crisis, and a gaping democratic deficit - have now metastasised. They have become too complex, too daunting for Europe's third-rate elites even to consider tackling, and especially for the selfish, demagogic politicians who have presided with such insouciance over its social disintegration, "degrowth", Potemkin militaries and appalling demographics. Germany, France,
the Netherlands and elsewhere are on the brink of social explosion, with farmers the latest to have become radicalised.

Any young, ambitious European would be better off moving to America, especially anti-woke Florida or Texas. They will pay less tax.They will live better, happier, freer lives.They will be less likely to face total war. Their living standards will be drastically higher.

In the 248-year intra-Western contest between the US and Europe, there has been only one winner. America is also sick, as witnessed by its own social decay, the rise of the woke ideology and the preposterous -rematch of the geriatrics between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Yet unlike in Paris, Berlin, Rome or Brussels, enough remains of its capitalist spirit, its dynamism, its entrepreneurialism, its love of science, meritocracy and technology, to see it through its current troubles.

Europe's greatest legacies to the world -capitalism, individual liberty, the rule of law
and the "Western, Educated, Industrialised,
Rich, and Democratic" (or "weird") values so
brilliantly described by Joseph Henrich of
Harvard University - will live on in the US.
But there is no way back for a European
continent that has embraced nihilism, post
Christian paganism, illiberalism and the
politics of envy, that believes that saving the
planet requires shutting down successful
industries and impoverishing its people, that
cannot face down Islamist extremism and
anti-Semitism, and that won't reform its
welfare state.

Even Brexit, the ultimate warning signal, failed to change anything. Europe's ruling class dismissed the UK's departure as an aberration, an own goal by self-harming British eccentrics, and doubled-down on its failed policies. It refused to listen to voters; no wonder their rage is becoming ever more combustible, inchoate and unfocused.

The EU population will peak at 453.3 million in two years' time, then slump to 419.5 million by 2100, despite massive immigration,Eurostat predicts. The population will agedrastically, driven by a collapse in the birthrate. Welfare states will implode, with taxesrocketing on the young to pay for healthcareand pensions for the old. The Euro-elites' onlyanswer, even more migration, will empowerpotentially dangerous extremists. In France,Germany, Belgium and elsewhere, the failureto integrate many recent migrants, and theruling class's answer - to lie that all is well - ispaving the way for a cataclysm. The rise ofGermany's AfD should worry us all. TheEuropean elections will see gains forpopulists.

The gulf in living standards between America and Europe keeps on widening. In the final quarter of 2023, US GDP grew by an annualised 3.3 per cent; the Eurozone grew by zero per cent and the German economy shrank again. Putin's invasion of Ukraine didn't help, but Europe shouldn't have become so dependent on Russian gas.

The continent's high-tax, high regulation
The continent's high-tax, high regulation
model has caused decades of under-performance, and now Emmanuel Macron, the EU and the Dutch and German governments are deliberately shutting down swathes of their agriculture to meet net-zero targets. The Germans are destroying their car industry, and Europe will import Chinese electric vehicles instead. Decades of "industrial strategy" and subsidies have failed to create a world-class European tech industry. The continent's economic suicide is already triggering an exodus of the best and brightest.

Europe's geopolitical irrelevance is equally striking. Its defence is being shouldered by long-suffering US taxpayers. The French are nowhere to be seen in the fight against the Houthis; its army is a shadow of its former self, and wouldn't last long in a real war. The Poles and a few others are trying their best, but the German military is a joke, and all the great promises to rebuild European armies made in 2022 have meant nothing. The
continent is almost completely demilitarised, lacks personnel and hardware, doesn't have the capacity to produce more of the latter, has zero long-term answers to contain Putin and has done nothing to prepare for the possibility of a second Trump victory. It's a disgrace.

It beggars belief that so many of the middle class British Remainers and Rejoiners, who will help propel Labour to victory this year, are still so unfathomably ignorant about the true state of Europe's economy and society. Blinded by anti-Tory hatred, obsessed by shiny TGVs and the memories of their pleasant holidays in southern Europe, they assume that things must - just must - bebetter in Europe.

Almost all Labour MPs privately believe that the solution to our own lack of growth is to rejoin the single market or customs union, even though these have failed to save Europe's own economies. How can further increasing our ties with a zero-growth continent or a shrinking German economy do anything for Britain? It can't. And how will the British Left respond to the rise of the far Right in Europe? Will it still love Germany if the AfD is part of its government? Will it still love statist France if Marine le Pen is in the Elysee?

Britain is in an appalling state, but so is Europe. The Brexiteers' Euro-pessimism has been vindicated; the problem is that the establishment refused to use Brexit to break with Brussels' regulatory philosophy and to re-orient our economy away from stagnant EU markets. Britain is therefore increasingly suffering from the same pathologies as Europe, and facing a similar terminal decline. This isn't an argument for more EU, but one for even less, as well as radical domestic change. Europe's gradual eclipse is accelerating, and it would be absurd for any British government to consider realigning the country with it.

Friday, 26 January 2024

RUSSIAN CRIMES

26 January 2024

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-war-russia-fridge-parts-uk-b2483117.html

Stunning version of what's going on, a pantheon of propaganda, but overlooking other important Russian failures, acts and omissions:

- Russia's military in the Ukraine invasion is resorting to dismantling household appliances for parts
- the war has set back Russia's military modernisation by nearly two decades
- Russia desperate, such as ordering weapons from North Korea and using Iranian drones 
- significant casualties and setbacks on the field
- the war benefits noone, neither Russians nor Ukrainians
- UK pledges continued support to Ukraine: military aid and humanitarian assistance 
- mistreatment of Russian mobilised troops, beatings by military commanders and challenging conditions at training grounds.

Yea yea...😃😃😃

What about:
 
- Russia's heinous record of intl malfeasance
- sanctions have ruined Russia's economy
- Russia has no friends
- Russia has five years left to live, that's all it's got.

Joking, right?

Monday, 22 January 2024

IS THE WEST IN NEED OF NATIONALISM

22 January 2024

How to "ensure the survival of our nation and culture". This is what we want, but The West is not doing a good job here and I wonder why. 

You might think that the problem in Ukraine is the same as the problem in Israel, in the sense that at the local level, these are civil war where one side is trying to push the other out of the country. Could the same circumstances provoke civil war in the UK?

Situations get out of control when, within the one state, a people are divided linguistically, religiously, culturally, along some fundamental line of cleavage, and the sides become intolerant of each other.

So you get to thinking that genocide, ethnic cleansing, deportation ... call it what what you want ...but basically the creation of a second state for one of the two sides to flee to and seek refuge in; or alternatively keep the minority for manual work, but suppress all their civil rights.

The appliction of this logic leads to:
- Bombing or secession of the Eastern provinces of Ukraine 
- The two-state solution for Israel or an apartheid state
- And maybe a Homeland for the Hindus or the Sikhs or I don't know what in the UK... a Homeland for the British!

But maybe this is wrong thinking, because the problem is not that the two cultures are irreconcilable, it is that the government has failed to integrate them.

And the case that proves this is actually Russia, because Russia is made up of five different ethnicities (at least, the neocon plan was to break the RF up into five statelets and pillage its abundant resources). But reality is that the Russian government has avoided civil war and all the different and diverse ethnicities are integrated into the Russian motherland.

The best example of this being Chechnya. We remember two facts at the same time : one is the Islamic insurgency or Sunni Jihad, which resulted in Grozny being flattened ; and the second is the outstanding contribution the Chechnyans have made to the war in Ukraine.

So really instead of seeking two-state solutions, with the country diminishing itself geopolitically and economically, perhaps we should ask why Kiev and Tel Aviv failed to integrate the Russian speakers and the Muslims respectively and respectfully. And that would be a useful lesson for our own troubles in France and the UK.

Incidentally, the West does not understand this "talking point" at all. The West thinks that Russia has imperial ambitions and Putin is a monster. It thinks Kiev's bombing the Russian-speakers in the east from 2014 was Russia's pretext for its invasion, but it wasn't a pretext at all it was a provocation, it was what provoked the "unprovoked" invasion and diabolising Putin sets everyone's emotions on edge when cooler, calculating, Russian heads are prevailing. 

Western government sources would have us believe the war in Ukraine began on 24 Febraury 2022 and in  Gaza on 7th October 2023.

In reality, it seems to be a problem of different identities unable to find their place within one National Identity. At the base of a successful integration is nationalism, a strong sense of common belonging, nuanced by recognising local differences or identities, of being Russian before all else, the motherland, for example.

France could really do with this. France is desperately in need of integrating the 10 to 20% of its population that has an identity from North Africa. Salafism or Wahhabism is dying out in the Middle East, with MBS in Saudi and al Sisi having removed the Brotherhood from Egypt and in Abu Dhabi, Dubai or the UAE generally, you have a greater sense of freedom walking about there than you do in many of the suburbs of large cities in France. Thus Arab or Muslim extremism is receding ... unless we in The West give it comfort.

So perhaps the reason why nationalism doesn't work on these guys in France of Arab extraction is more that they remember the colonial experience, especially Algeria, and feel the mistreatment continues in the metropole, rather than because they're Muslim and are looking to convert us from our own beliefs and rules to Islam and Charia. It is civil rights rather than wars of religion. After, they are human too, no? Want peace, prosperity, free to worship whomsoever, send their kids to a good school, move to the suburbs or a nice house further out with a garden and a swing, no?

And what about America, where there appears to be a moral nihilism on the part of the elite and an existential nihilism on the part of the people? The original Protestant settlers exterminated the native population (hello hello), as being sub-human. And then brought in large numbers of Africans which it has never succeeded in integrating, there has been only trouble since the civil rights movement of the 60s. (Civil rights is real equality of treatment under the law, for blacks, for russian-speakers, for palestinians...).

In our Western democracies, the oligarchs rise to the surface, exploit their power And seem to run Congress as part of the military industrial complex, but in a so-called totalitarian (ie no western style democracy with alternance of parties in power) states like China, noone is beyond the reach of state-defined justice. Jack Ma was getting too big for his boots and he was relegated, as were the oligarchs like Mikhail Khodorkovsky in Russia - this was one of the first things Putin did to end the post-Soviet chaos and create structures and order. 

So that looks like the triumph of equality, to unite ethnically / religeously / linguistically different peoples. Unite through fair and equal treatment into one national identity. You know it's working when Muslims go to fight and die for Russia in Ukraine

Equality. So is it democracy (freedom) v. equality? 

Maybe that is what stops the West from integrating its diverse minorities ... here is the irony, or hypocrisy if you prefer. Western liberal democracies drop their border walls to let in diverse peoples whom they proceed to exploit and then wonder why there are these distractions like identity / culture wars and woke parades and civil rights disturbances and cancellations for those outside the box ( like those who've read this far!) and eventually Civil War.


[ For another time, are Liberals pushing individualism too far, at the expense of a stabilising collective identity?]