BIDEN CORRUPTION - HOW IS IT BIDEN IS STILL POTUS?

16 November 2023

How come this charlo is still POTUS?

is.gd/hHPhuZ

"Our mission statement is to ensure the efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability of the federal government and all its agencies. We provide a check and balance on the role and power of Washington - and a voice to the people it serves."

The detail summarised:

In February 2014, a Russian Oligarch Sent $3.5 Million to a Shell Company Associated with Hunter Biden and Devon Archer: Russian billionaire Yelena Baturina transferred $3.5 million to Rosemont Seneca Thornton, a shell company.

Hunter Biden was initially hired by Burisma to work as counsel for the company, and Pozharsky and Zlochevsky met with Hunter Biden at a conference in Lake Como in Italy where they decided Hunter Biden would work on the board of directors with Devon Archer.

In April 2014, a Kazakhstani Oligarch Wired the Exact Price of Biden’s Sportscar to a Bank Account Used by Archer and Biden: In February 2014, Hunter Biden met with Kenes Rakishev at a Washington, D.C. hotel.

Hunter Biden received millions of dollars in payments from Yelena Baturina, Burisma, and Kenes Rakishev.

Read More

IS WESTERN SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL AND UKRAINE SUCCEEDING?

13 November 2023

Things are looking very bad. The Russians are butchering the Ukrainians, and along comes Hamas with a jolly trap for Israel. Israel fell in straight away so now we have another bloodbath.

The circumstances are horrific, although this is a military confrontation. What might happen when hostilies cease?

Let's take a look at what these ongoing massacres mean through three lenses. The scale is global: these conflicts are local, between nation-states, almost you might see them as civil wars, but they regional and most importantly, global repercussions. Second, the timeline started five centuries ago: today, we are looking at the West in decline, the unravelling of colonisation. Of course thirdly, there is a moral dimension: we should ask if supporting these causes is ethically correct as our actions will impact our credibility in the negotiating and implementation phases of resolving these conflicts.

THE DECLINE OF THE WEST

Back in the late 60s, we had Edward Säid who captured the West's attitude to Asia in the wor "Orientalism". Orientalism is the idea that the Middle East and Asia was one clump of mysterious underdevelopment that would never change. But now after five centuries of running their worlds, and ober 2,500 years of a culture dating back to the Greeks, it is the turn of "the Global South" to look at "Westernism" and see our decline, see the failures of America and NATO against Russia, see the wasted trillions in failed foreign adventures. 

Meanwhile China finishes off its belt and road and Russia re-industrialises.

America is no longer the "indispensable nation", it has failed at policing conflict situations, indeed it has created them, it has no manifest destiny or ability to rule over us in the name of global security. It listens to no-one, it just sends in the military (rarely its own).

INJUSTICE

Not just bloodbaths and Western decline,  once we were the beacon of justice and fair play, and now we indict Putin while Natanyahu gets a free pass, we sanction Russia for non-respect of Intl law while Israel flouts 70 years of UN resolutions. What was once a boundary dispute is now a war of religion, a clash of civilisations: in the one a negotiated solution was possible, but Islam demands total surrender and Zionism is colonisation of biblical lands for the coming of the messiah. Before 7 October we could have fixed what is for the Arabs and Persians united, the mother of battles to come. But look now at the dogs we've woken up with such complacent and brutal kicks, to the point where now it is uncontrollable. And then there's "the enemy within".

GLOBAL 

It's not obvious that ordinary people nor our elites truly realise that the West is now in the minority and facing an increasingly organised and powerful global majority. These aren't just "talking points". It's not just the Middle East, the Arabs and the Persians: now it's Africa and the rest of Asia and Russia too. It means the West cannot force through to the touchline. America can no longer do what it has been trying to do since the last war which is force its internal policies onto the rest of the world.

Here's a tape of a speech by indonesia's representative to the UN. Indonesia! Who normally wouldn't say boo to a goose!

ONLY SOLUTION IS MILITARY

It is not just military. It's not 48, 67 or 73. Today Israel is risking its homeland, sure, and losing the moral battle, the battle of ideas. Netanyahu has no plan that we know of other than his own salvation, his promise to keep Israel safe is false, and he is up against an organised and global enemy with ideology, strategy, plan, actions and results. 

So it is a time for diplomacy, cooperation, working to find agreed solutions. The military is not the end, it is in service to politics and diplomacy. But I don't think there's anyone in Washington who could state what is the role of a diplomat. I don't think they understand diplomacy. And their goal of world domination is madness these days, I mean ... isn't that obvious? Same same for Israel's revenge.

Because the Middle East had been quiet, as Jake Sullivan observed, doesn't mean that the Israel-Palestine conflict wasn't ruminating away. But even if America would agree to a two-state solution, there are no moderate voices in Israel nor Gaza to lead the negotiations - they are dead or radicalised. And even if a two-state solution were agreed and the 700,000 illegal settlers in the West Bank were cleared things have come to a pretty pass and I think the Arab nations would wipe out the lesser Israel the day after it was reformed, because America will be too weak to back it.

ISRAEL CANNOT SUCCEED ITS MISSION

More practically, the aim of the Israeli operation in Gaza is to destroy Hamas. Really? There's no way they can pull this off unless they commit genocide and kill all Palestinians in Greater Israel.

THE RESULT LONG-TERM WILL BE MORE TERRORISTS AND LESS SECURITY

For each Hamas member that they kill, they create ten more.

This operation gets revenge but doesn't improve Israel's security problem. It just unites the Arab world and the Global Majority against Israel and The West.

The number one priority of any country is its security, but this operation will only reduce Israeli security. 

America's top generals have come through the fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan and they know that the longer this goes on, the more children and women especially that are killed, the more terrorists are recruited.

THE RISK OF WORLD WAR INCREASES

America has forward deployed huge numbers of men and equipment to the area what does this do for the prospects of a third world war?

We can seek a permanent resolution in line with UN Security Council resolutions, or we can seek military solutions.

Read More

UKRAINE IS LOST TO EUROPE

13 November 2023

Ukraine is lost to Europe and the dying EU should conserve contributions from member states for worthwhile projects that enhance our peace and prosperity.

Ukraine has lost this war. It foolishly rejected peace in 2015 and in 2022 and now faces the consequences. The people of Ukraine will realise how idiotic has been their president, who has cost them half a million lives. They will rise up against him. He will flee the country to one of his numerous villas bought with money from American and European taxpayers or from Arms sold into other conflict areas around the world by members of his corrupt oligarchy.

The number one purpose of this war was to get Ukraine into NATO: that will never happen. The idea of Ukraine joining the EU is completely absurd and purely another political dream from our leaders very far out of touch with reality, since Ukraine is at war and in any case is economically completely unviable. Frankly, who would want to take on the burden of Ukraine? And where would they find the money?

The answer is that only Russia is in a position to offer Ukraine a prosperous and peaceful future. There is plenty of room for optimism. Ukraine's future lies in some kind of a rebuild and reindustrialization arrangement with Russia. Russia will see to Ukraine as it did in the 18th century when Katherine the Great and her architect Potemkin built Novo Rossiya.

I would imagine that the east from Odessa up to Kiev will be reintegrated into Russia and the portion that is left, the"rump", can be given to the Poles or can attempt to continue limping along as a state dependent on Moscow.

How can anyone ever have the slightest confidence in our foolhardy politicians? They have put us into the greatest debt we have ever known, they have taken us to two wars now, they have sullied our culture with mass immigration, they struggle with solutions for climate change and they are unable to deal with almost daily civil war in our societies.

We live in poverty, inflation and violence; our health service is non-existent, our schools are falling apart, our defenses are not up to it.

Failure after failure after failure. We need serious politicians who represent our interests. W need a 20 year program to find independence from America and its collapsing Order.

AND EUROPE WILL RISE AGAIN

Amen

Read More

WHY INTELLECTUALS ARE MOSTLY LEFTIES

6 November 2023

This is the title of an extract from a conversation between Roger Scruton and Hamza Yusuf.

https://youtu.be/FYo4KMhUx9c?si=Wfj6jcH9797jumbQ

It's a very good presentation by Roger. He is talking about the appeal of left-wing ideologies today to those seeking a solid framework for their beliefs and ideas, pegs on which they can hang their knowledge. Like the leaves on a tree, if the leaves are the bits of knowledge, an ideology connects all through eventually to one central trunk, which is their ideological belief system. 

This is inevitably lefty thinking, or Marxism if you prefer. Roger says that the day will one day come to anyone with a living brain when that person is able to look back at the time when they had an ideology and realise that today they do not need reasons to explain the way things: things are simply the way they are. Someone who doesn't need reasons any longer is someone who we might call a Conservative.

I think it's not only the attraction of a coherent system of thought for navigating a complex topic - politics, political behaviour -  that pulls in younger people and those with intellectual questions at university.

But I think as well there's this thing called Group Think, which is a bit like an equivalent in the financial world to FOMO, fear of missing out - if you don't join the group then you're likely to be ostracised and see your career cut down. So newbies at the margin join up, for fear others in the core will think they "don't understand", ie have puny intellects, and after that initial commitment they just go into the subject deeper and deeper.

It's a bit like walking into a forest. It gets darker and darker and darker and then eventually you start to walk out of the forest and eventually the daylight begins to return and you start to see the world as it really is, as it always was, when you were a child, you see more objectively, and you can start to make connections and associations of your own.

This FOMO thing is part of how soft power works, as well. If you don't join the neocons then your career as a journalist or a teacher or in high administration or in politics, your career will be shortened because you have ideas that oppose those of the ruling elite, you are therefore against them. There's not much room for nuance lower down in the hierarchy.

It must be annoying to non-extremist contrarians like Roger, never to get a proper hearing for his ideas. Dead now poor chap, coming up to his 4th annif' this Jan24.

Group Think and the lack of diversity of perspectives - not the same things - is very dangerous  ... look at the mess we're in today, for example. Look at the Central Banks. They are all staffed by hundreds upon hundreds of PhDs in economics, all of whom pretty much are neo-Keynesian ie they all think that debt is not so important because the job of the government is to intervene in the market with fiscal and monetary policies that will smooth out short term irregularities, but in reality they can't see the consequences of their Grand Designs of untested ideas, like QE, and hence the mess we're in today. 

It's just the same with all these lefties who think the individual is unimportant and the interests of workers worldwide, as they see them, should prime over the liberty of the individual.

We know that the interests of the individual and the nation will out against the collectivists and the internationalists. We know that you build a wall from the ground up, brick by brick, and don't start at the top!

And we know that the neoclassicists in economics are right when they talk about the need for a balanced budget and for letting individuals in the market combine to decide, each blindly, the way forward.

As to Hegel's "Labour of the Negative", that Roger talks about, yes it's true that Roger's negativists think that the world is all wrong and the only way to put it right is to seize power in order to put into practice your  blueprint for your New Utopia, that's true.

But as I recall Edmund Burke when he looked at the French Revolution in 1789, just like Roger did his in 1968, he concluded that Revolution will fail just as Grand Designs fail, and progress can only really come from incremental change, "in-flight corrections", if you prefer. Roger says he spent his life trying to find out what he didn't like about the mess those students were making of policemen's helmets back in 1968.

The real trouble with the left is its collectivist thinking. It makes grand designs for the future, ignoring present realities and ignoring human nature ; and then when things go wrong it realises that it was because it didn't have perfect knowledge, that is the problem. It's the lack of perfect knowledge that you would need for Grand Designs to work out as planned.

So that's me for the day...

Read More

LES ROUDOUDOUX

31 October 2023

(Version française en bas)

                                                  Roudoudoux

Strange how the mind works, leading you along country roads ...

Where does the word "Mistral" come from?

What is "Le Mistral Gagnant"?

My grandchildren to-be.

Where does the word "Mistral" come from?

"Mistral" ("Master" in Occitan) 

As everyone knows, the Mistral, originally, is the name of a cold wind that blows for a few strong days at a time down the Rhone river and out into the Med., the Gulf of Lion, reaching the Balearics and Palma. It's one of eight winds blowing across the Med from the eight points of the compass.

If you travel Provence, you'll notice the farmhouses mostly face South, not for the sea, but to have your back to the wind. And the belfries and bell towers are often of wrought iron to let this wind through!!

What is "Le Mistral Gagnant"?

There was a French singer-songwriter, Renaud, still around today, surprising as he's a right alkie-alcoholic. He was very popular in the 1970s 80s 90s.

He wrote a very sentimental song for his little daughter, all about his memories from when he was her age, stealing sweets from his sweet shop. It was published in 1985, the year I arrived in France.

Anyway, one of those sweets was a kind of sherbet dip, sherbet that you sucked up through a liquorice straw so it fizzled and exploded and sent a rush of cool across your tongue. And the name the sweetmaker gave to that bonbon was "mistral gagnant", hence the name of Renaud's song.

Another favourite were "les roudoudoux" - a dob of brightly coloured sugar syrup served in a seashell that the girls would lick out and so doing often cut their little pink tongues.

My grandchildren to-be.

Well that's a very nostalgic song of memories past, but for me it's a song about the future. I have two wonderful sons, no daughters as it happens, so I am looking forward to having grandchildren.

Le Mistral gagnant

https://youtu.be/_YqzuE-5RE8?si=mlzMrxbfHZWqeLpI

Lyrics

(Click to see lyrics in original and translation)

===

31 octobre 2023

 D'où vient le mot « Mistral » ?

 Qu'est-ce que "Le Mistral Gagnant" ?

 Mes futurs petits-enfants.

 D'où vient le mot « Mistral » ?

"Mistral" ("Maitre" en Occitan) 

 Comme chacun le sait, le Mistral, à l'origine, est le nom d'un vent froid qui souffle pendant quelques jours forts à la fois sur le Rhône et dans la Méditerranée, le Golfe du Lion, pour atteindre les Baléares et Palma.  C'est l'un des huit vents qui soufflent sur la Méditerranée depuis les huit points cardinaux.

 Si vous voyagez en Provence, vous remarquerez que les mas sont pour la plupart orientés plein sud, non pas pour la mer, mais pour tourner le dos au vent.  Et les beffrois et clochers sont souvent en fer forgé pour laisser passer ce vent !!

 Qu'est-ce que "Le Mistral Gagnant" ?

 Il y avait un auteur-compositeur-interprète français, Renaud, toujours là aujourd'hui, surprenant car il est un vrai alcoolique.  Il était très populaire dans les années 1970, 80 et 90.

 Il a écrit une chanson très sentimentale pour sa petite fille, qui raconte ses souvenirs quand il avait son âge, lorsqu'il volait des bonbons dans sa confiserie du coin.  Ce chanson fut publié en 1985, l'année de mon arrivée en France, comme par hasard.

 Quoi qu'il en soit, l'un de ces bonbons était une sorte de trempette au sorbet, un sorbet qu'on aspirait avec une paille de réglisse pour qu'il pétille et explose et envoie un flot de fraîcheur sur ta langue.  Et le nom que le confiseur a donné à ce bonbon était « mistral gagnant », d'où le nom de la chanson de Renaud.

 Un autre favori était "les roudoudoux" - une dose de sirop de sucre aux couleurs vives, servi dans un vrai coquillage que les filles léchaient et se coupaient ainsi souvent leur petite langue rose.

 Mes futurs petits-enfants.

 Eh bien, c'est une chanson très nostalgique sur les souvenirs du passé, mais pour moi, c'est une chanson sur le futur.  J'ai deux merveilleux fils, mais pas de filles, donc j'ai hâte d'avoir des petits-enfants.

 Le Mistral gagnant

 https://youtu.be/_YqzuE-5RE8?si=mlzMrxbfHZWqeLpI

 Lyrics

 (Cliquez pour voir les paroles en original et en traduction)

===

Saka ngendi asale tembung "Mistral"?

"Mistral" ("Master" ing basa Occitan)

 Minangka everyone mangerténi, Mistral, Originally, iku jeneng angin kadhemen sing ngunekke kanggo sawetara dina kuwat ing wektu mudhun kali Rhone lan metu menyang Med., Teluk Singa, tekan Balearics lan Palma.  Iki minangka salah siji saka wolung angin sing nyabrang Med saka wolung titik kompas.

 Yen sampeyan lelungan Provence, sampeyan bakal sok dong mirsani farmhouses biasane ngadhepi South, ora kanggo segara, nanging duwe bali menyang angin.  Lan lonceng lan menara lonceng asring saka wesi tempa supaya angin iki liwat!!

 Apa "Le Mistral Gagnant"?

 Ana penyanyi-penulis lagu Prancis, Renaud, isih ana nganti saiki, nggumunake amarga dheweke alkohol alkohol sing bener.  Dheweke misuwur banget ing taun 1970-an 80-an 90-an.

 Dheweke nulis lagu sing sentimental banget kanggo putrine sing cilik, kabeh babagan kenangan nalika umure, nyolong permen saka toko manise.  Iki diterbitake ing taun 1985, taun aku teka ing Prancis.

 Oalah, salah siji saka manisan iku jenis sherbet dip, sherbet sing sampeyan nyedhot munggah liwat liquorice kang dipercoyo supaya fizzled lan mbledhos lan dikirim rush saka kelangan liwat ilat.  Lan jeneng sing diparingake dening tukang manis kanggo bonbon kasebut yaiku "mistral gagnant", mula jenenge lagu Renaud.

 Favorit liyane yaiku "les roudoudoux" - sirup gula sing warnane cerah sing disuguhake ing cangkang sing bakal didilat bocah-bocah wadon lan mula asring ngethok ilat jambon cilik.

 Calon putuku.

 Lha kuwi lagu kenangan masa lalu sing nostalgia banget, nanging kanggoku lagu masa depan.  Aku duwe anak lanang loro sing apik-apik, ora ana anak wadon kaya sing kedadeyan, mula aku ngarep-arep duwe putu.

 Le Mistral gagnant

 https://youtu.be/_YqzuE-5RE8?si=mlzMrxbfHZWqeLpI

Lyrics Lirik

 (Klik kanggo ndeleng lirik ing asli lan terjemahan)

 

Read More

BY POPULAR REVOLT

Why isn't Europe doing anything practical to prevent israeli war crimes?

It is obvious to any cynic that the coming israeli clearout of gaza is in line with the historic orthodox intention of reoccupying holy land. Bibi is ready to risk everything in the service of this goal - his own personal future is a chip he is playing as well.

The stakes are raised in every domain of human activity on this planet. That sounds v dramatic, but the risks faced by peoples everywhere and the lies being told are without precedent.

===

The MSM prevents any comment on this subject.

Take stock of the severity of political and military positions taken by leaders everywhere across Earth, we see high stakes the stakes are raised in every domain of human activity. That sounds v dramatic, but the risks faced by peoples everywhere and the lies being told are without precedent.

While I cannot imagine my fellow countryman taking to the streets in the millions, history shows that these desperate situations are always resolved by what you might call popular revolt.

I would only say that comment is about the only safety valve at the moment and the FT is not showing much wisdom for the long term by bottling up the legitimateconcerns of ordinary thinking folk like me.

It's the same everywhere and without giving a fair hearing to both sides and without responding to people's demands it will all end in blood and tears.

Europe by its wealth and its population is bigger than America, but Europe is in shackles to America. What is needed is a long-term plan to redress or remove American influence.

====

Europe by its wealth and its population is bigger than America, but Europe is in shackles to America. What is needed is a long-term plan to redress or remove American influence.

Read More

ARE NATWEST SHARES A BARGAIN?

29 October 2023

Banks often trade at less than book value, ie the market cap is below the book value, book value is assets minus liabilities.

So the questions today are: why do banks often trade below their book value and are NatWest shares currently a bargain or is NatWest a value trap?

In general, banks may trade below book value for many reasons. Geopolitical uncertainties that threaten global peace and the price of oil, is one factor. Investors are uncertain about the quality and valuation of the bank's assets - its  loans, securities, or derivatives. Banks face many risks - credit risk, interest rate risk, regulatory risk. Then there are macroeconomic conditions, such as interest rates, economic growth, and inflation, that can influence a bank's profitability and so its market valuation. As to the regulatory environment around operations and capital requirements, these may limit the bank's ability to generate high returns on equity.

The special problem at this time is how the sudden rise in interest rates and promise of "higher for longer" has impaired the quality of bank loans and reduced their valuation. Not just banks but insurance companies too insurance companies try to match their future liabilities with future income from safe and stable assets usually government bonds but owing to the very low interest rate regime insurance companies have had to move into the equities and derivatives market in order to do this matching.

Today, let's look at just one factor: derivatives trading. This is not widely understood and so often overlooked. Typically, of a bank's total earning, half or more would come from the interest on making loans, while another 25% might come from derivatives trading.

When you look at the amounts the bank puts at risk from this trading, they are totally crazy, and can be as much as 50 times the bank's market cap.

What are derivatives? What is hedging? Derivatives are just agreeing a future price on for example a commodity like wheat, old as the hills this was farmers securing next year's income, and then when the time comes the differences are settled and someone wins it all and someone loses it all. A bank will buy a bunch of assets that it considers are ever so slightly undervalued and then it will hedge its bet by shorting similar assets that it considers slightly overvalued; and it will wait for those differences, or valuation gaps, to close and pocket the money. That is how hedge funds use derivatives to make money.

That sounds risky, who can predict the weather? Uncertain, even though the differences between the future price and the present price may be quite small.

But that's nothing risky. What really makes it risky is that because those differences are so small, the banks weigh in really heavily using borrowed money to magnify their expected gain - this kind of leverage makes for a hugely risky game, one that can produce spectacular gains or of course catastrophic losses. 

What leverage multiplier? LTCM Long Term Capital Management is the usual quoted example. It leveraged 25 times so its market cap of four billion was turned into a bet of a hundred billion, which it could have lost, which would have devastated its creditors and its lenders and brought down the system. Lehman brothers went bankrupt when the government allowed the sub-prime crisis to collapse Lehman bringing on the 2008 financial crisis. Its leverage was 30 to 1. Thirty to one. Just consider that, set in the context of "too big to fail" and "moral hazard". The profits are pocketed but the losses are mutualised with taxpayers.

Risks at that level explain why banks often trade at below par and especially at this moment in the financial system where everything seems to be going pear-shaped...

But as Joseph Wang said today,

 https://youtu.be/TU423lhdNng?si=UMrUHyaN42lAfgrD 

things seem to be past their worst, in which case those Natwest shares, now trading at 72% of book value, may be very cheap indeed! And compared with their peers, this is cheap. 

NatWest's 3rd quarter revenues and earnings missed analysts' expectations by 3.3 and 3.8 pc, and earnings are expected to decline by 5.8pc per year for the next three years, but were impressive - revenue up 9.3pc, net income up 64pc, EPS 10GBp as against 5.9 3Q2022, profit margin 29pc up from 20pc a year earlier - mainly from the higher revenue. PEG 5-yr expected is just 0.38.

The share price declined 17pc on these results, leaving the stock trading on a forward PE of 4x as against 5x in the UK banking industry. Total returns to shareholders have been 68pc over the past three years. 

The current yield is 8.5%, 15.5 GBp, as against an average of 6pc for banking as a whole, on a payout ratio of just 31pc, EPS were 52 GBp. An unreliable divi record, though applying the same payout ratio, are forecast to reach 11.3pc in three years.

shareholder returns incl dividends

 

Luke Gromen tells a very different story from Joseph Wang,

https://youtu.be/jJ3ajrsz-IY?si=TNzvRfoy9no-8oPq

He argues that the bond market will collapse (ie the entire economy) if the US dollar and oil remain high.

Impossible to say whether NatWest shares are a buy or an avoid with all this uncertainty, but in general financials are not a part of the economy where many contrarian analysts would choose to be, better to be in hard assets, precious metals, commodities, manufacturing possibly, industries connected with renewal of infrastructure and utilities.

Read More

THE TROUBLE WITH THE MIDDLE EAST

25 October 2023

Sunak, von Leyen, go to Jerusalem to show support for Netanyu's bombing of his concentration camp.

This is so disgusting! This is one of those rare ocassions where ordinary people - well, me - would take to the streets.

It is so hugely outrageous and really difficult to understand. They should be supporting Guetteres and not Netanyahu. Israel should be blackballed by the West.

What does this do for our global standing?

This is a phase in the West's history where its fear of decline is blinding it to reason. The West has taken off its thinking cap, enlightenment Europe is stupidly following the idiot leadership in Washington. It is not even following its emotions, it is more a primeval, reptilian, response.

It was France that led us out of the dark ages intellectually speaking with its revolutionary values and its creation, practically-speaking, of the nation state. France was a beacon to the world, shining these modern ideas from Europe.

And yet look at that twat Macron, there's no other word for him, he goes to Israel and confirms that the priority is the release of Israeli hostages. This is really foolish and if enacted would get this conflict absolutely nowhere -  releasing the hostages is the very last thing to do, only once there is enactament of peace and justice.

The Israeli state is a fait accompli, a historical fact, but bombing its Arab citizens out of existence, or pushing them into the desert or the sea, is completely and totally unacceptable - it's ethnic cleansing, it's genocide ... call it what you want.

The Israelis are hysterical as usual because all this has happened to them before and anyway they are a people from the scorched and ever-shifting sands of the Middle East, they are all the same: highly emotional, overheated, raging, blind....extreme heat and unrelenting sun can generate emotions like frustration and irritability, emotions that overwhelm. 

Try to imagine the relief that the shade of a man's hand brings when the temperature is 50° - this is a story from the Bible incidentally, it's a story we living in cooler climes have difficulty in relating to but if you've ever lived there, you'll understand why these people can be so rabid and why Islam was the true "final solution" and why ordinary Muslims are generally the most peaceful people on earth. 

But here we are following them in their hysteria where we should be calming them down and taking issue with them and putting them on a path which would avoid a major conflagration.

This is Zionism that is responsible, this idea of a greater Israel from the Jordan to the Mediterranean, of a completely false idea of a land with no people for a people with no land. To condemn Zionism is not being anti-semitic or jewophobic it is to condemn a nasty and pernicious ideology and condemn a government that is driven by this racist thinking. Jews everywhere should be ashamed of Netanyahu and the extreme orthodox right.

If there are three rules in life for finding the truth and a way firward, the first is to chuck away all ideologies (not easy) (religeon is an ideology btw). Zionism is an understandable response to the pogroms, but it is still a very nasty "ism" that wouldn't last five minutes if it were freely debated in public, in Europe today.

https://youtu.be/zUuOayK9lb8?si=PkE1-PmWioaew5rb

And to that video, this three-star general that is helping the Israeli government plan its ground offensive. Well there are apparently about 48 four and five star generals these days in America's DoD, whereas the last war was won by eight such generals. I seem to recall this from a Mearsheimer.

And as to these tunnels. I have no idea, but I would imagine that the heavy bombing is an exercise producing seismic information that would allow a pretty clear mapping of The Tunnels and then just rolling down damn-buster type bombs through them would collapse them, I would imagine.

And yeah all the longer term health consequences of blowing apart buildings full of toxic castinogens or all that depleted uranium and all the other stuff, it  isn't exactly good for nature and the environment - these are really stupid people we are dealing with, stupid in the Ekhart Tolle sense of not being in tune with the universe.

Read More

WHY DOES AMERICA CHOOSE CONFLICT OVER COOPERATION?

23 October 2023

Isn't it about time that the fed which is the fourth arm of government stood up to defend the currency which is its role after all.

And more particularly why has it allowed the government to carry on spending in a way that is completely unrelated to its income?

America has identified and provoked enemies in Russia and China and the Middle East where none of these countries sought a conflict. Why did America frustrate the UN agreement that it signed to resolve the crisis in Ukraine between Kiev and the Donbas known as the Minsk 2 Accord of 2015?

Why did America sabotage the peace agreement that Ukraine was negotiating with Moscow in March last year?

Why is America provoking China in its relations with Taiwan and in its sanctions?

Why is America taking such an overly partisan role in the Israeli conflict, failing to support its own two state solution and attracting the ire of the global majority?

Why is America pushing war and unfair trade practices, instead of getting on down and doing what it did so well in the past, which was technical innovation, commercial success and global detente?

Why are we in Europe vasellised and mistreated - even the outrage of blowing up our infrastructure and forcing us to fight our principal supplier and our principal external customer - by a senile dictator in Washington, instead of jointly developing true policies between equal allies with shared goals and objectives of peace, justice and prosperity?

It is demented.

Read More

IS AMERICA OVERWHELMED ECONOMICALLY, OVERSTRETCHED EMPIRICALLY AND DIVIDED SOCIALLY?

23 October 2023

Assessing whether the United States is overwhelmed in its economy, its global role, and its domestic affairs, is a matter of perspective, and opinions on this subject can vary widely. I take a pretty negative and cynical standpoint, not by personal disposition, but from history and my own reading of events.

Here are some considerations:

Perspective

Let's be perfectly frank about this, is that the Americans have no idea what they are doing and no plan going forward. They are just hopeless. All they can do is destroy, but now their game of Whac-A-Mole is bigger than them.

All this is driven by sentiment and ideology, without much in the way of pragmatic planning, matching requirements to resources, budgeting, a sense of cooperation and shared destiny with the rest of the world, just the deaf head and violence.

Just to state the obvious and what everyone knows:

1. Economy

The U.S. still has the largest economy in the world, perhaps not measured by PPP, but it does face economic challenges. Issues such as income inequality, high levels of debt (both at the government and household levels), and the impact of the pandemic and its failed sanctions against others, have generated economic concerns. However, on the bright side, the U.S. does have a history of resilience and adaptability in its economy - I was sure the end was nigh in 2008, but here we are still rolling along in 2023.

However, not only do tax receipts not cover expenses, but in reality there is no budget to control against and with inflation keeping up interest rates and a debt of 33 trillion, interest payments are fast approaching half the federal expenditure. Who is going to want to fund that longer term?

Ok the dollar is the world's reserve currency and when the world is stressed there is this flight to safety where everyone, not just for reasons of trade, but reasons of safety, buys the dollar ... but for how much longer can that continue? How much longer can the world keep confidence in the dollar? And for how much longer can interest rates contain inflation without breaking the bond market and thus equities and the whole economy?

The fourth branch of government, the Fed, and Powell, "the man in the arena", are doing a fantastic job of managing progress along the tight rope, but to the left is system collapse and to the right is currency desruction; and while things look okay and humming along on the surface, deep down there are structural undercurrents that will push him off.

2. Global role

The U.S. has a complex global role with around 800 military bases worldwide. While it maintains a strong military presence and plays a significant role in international affairs, truth be told it faces challenges in maintaining its global leadership due to changing geopolitical dynamics that it has provoked, including the threat from Russia, the rise of China. We have entered a multi-polar world which America seems unable to manage or even accept.

America is readying itself for and is financing a three-front war against Russia, China and the Middle East Arab states.

Plus with its history of war followed by debacle, its bullying and vassalising of its allies instead of cooperating and goal-sharing, its partisan support of lost causes, it has provoked a global majority in the form of BRICS+++ and on the floor, the General Assembly, of the UN against it where control of the Middle East is being wrestled from it.

3. Social issues

The U.S. faces numerous social challenges at home, such as political polarisation, racial and social inequalities, and healthcare disparities. These issues have led to debates about the state of domestic affairs and governance.

Governance. No pragmatic plan for dealing with Russia. No pragmatic plan for Israel. Can't even elect a house speaker. Unacceptable levels of inequality. 

Social. A country divided between extremists of a traditional disposition and neo- liberals.

Communication. Plus all this spin and propaganda - you have only to step outside the MSM, use your head, and the truth is there all around you, the dire circumstances the west led by America finds itself in. So for how much longer can the elite continue to contain the people?

Conclusions and hopes for the future

So we are in what is famously called The Fourth Turning, but instead of adaption,  reform and a rebirth of the American Order, which is what we in Europe would like most of all, we are likely to get more defeat and currency collapse, maybe a global war, and probabl over the next decade a takeover where the West is put into the service of a new Order.

If you believe that history is made by great men rather than say geography, demography, technology or global rivalry, then in the West of today we have senility and lack of direction in place of wisdom and clarity. Today's government has lost its power of decision and America has lost its way. 

We remember Kennedy's famous peace speech in 1963, we remember the process of detente begun in 1967 between Presidents Johnson and Kosygin, and we remember how an end to the Vietnam war was negotiated back in Paris in that same year allowing Nixon And Kissinger to normalise relations with China.

So while we can only expect defeat and failure from this administration, perhaps the next will be the one to reform and negotiate a way forward and stave off collapse. 

Read More

MONEY HEAVEN UNLOCKS THE DEBT CRISIS, CLIMATE CHANGE AND FOREIGN WARS.

21 October 2023

Since 1971, US govt.s have spent like there's no tomorrow - today it seems like there won't be.

America broke the dollar-gold link because France and Germany were asking that the money they'd lent be returned in gold. Effectively, America had defaulted. 

Correct me if I have misunderstood things.

America is in a cleft stick. Tax receipts don't cover expenses, raising interest rates take interest payments to ? 40% of receipts, so need to borrow even more...but who is going to lend at that risk and that interest rate, so the markets are driving the 10-year yield.

Lower rates and you stoke inflation. 

Raise rates and you bust bonds, then equities, then the real economy.

First, property suffers, especially commercial. 

Then higher inflation causes demand to slacken so company revenues fall. 

Higher rates to tackle inflation mean higher costs for companies, on top of lower revenues and mean lower earnings. 

If profits fall, people get fired, unemployment rises. 

Now, welfare increases and demand in the economy drops. And so on...

How can the fed keep rates high when this will bust the bond market?

How can it meet interest payments?

The value of bonds is inversely related to the coupon and so if rates rise, bonds fall in value.

But these bonds are often collateral for other loans,

 which get downgraded and then at BBV- they reach junk status and have to be sold,

 increasing pressure on the bond market.

It is just cause-and-effect linkages, "action-reaction", Hegelian logic.

At first, they spent money they had.

Then, they spent money because it was so cheap.

And now, they spend because they no longer care, because they have to, the dollar is a busted flush and they know very well that the only way out is "higher forever"....higher inflation and total currency debasement...."the pound in your pocket" ha ha. That way, in real terms (face value minus inflation), the debt is worthless, it's gone, all burnt up ... but so is the currency.

So both parties in Congress and Parliament are as one in their delusions of Anglo-Saxon exceptionalism, divine providence and eternal hegemony. 

They enter foolish foreign adventure after foolish foreign adventure because they are totally paralysed, cannot evolve, cannot share, cannot understand.

They think they can endlessly spend their way out of trouble as if there are no limits.

Meanwhile populism reigns, the people take to the streets in their disgust at the wealth gap and these stupid wars. The elite won't change, can't change.

Meanwhile, they further their fortunes and careers. They offer us distractions and petty talking points, "liberal values", "human rights", identity politics, political correctness, they insult us with their specious propaganda.

It's worse than this. China too has a lot of debt and future obligations. This won't be an easy time for most countries on Earth. Geopolitics and climate change combine into a very severe existential threat.

It is absolutely true that geopolitics, climate, change and debt, combine into a dreadful "no tomorrow" scenario, but debt first of all.

MONEY HEAVEN

1. While there are Wars the world over, driven by fear and greed, it strikes me that the weakest of frontiers is the East-West divide in Europe, running from Finland right through to the Caucuses. With Europe, America and bits of east Asia up to Australia behind the line to the west; and Russia, China and the BRICS+ behind that line to the east. 

The West v. The Global Majority. 

In consequence, a Security conference is needed if we are to avoid to WW3...better not wait till after, but history teaches that an elite will never willingly go.

2. Managing cimate change, from the little that I understand, is already strategised and planned and even programmed, it's organised; it's just "the execution premium" that is missing.

3. And as to global debt, I cannot really imagine all the reckoning that is needed to cancel this all out, it's just too big for anyone's head to figure it out, but finally isn't it the politics of bean-counting? Perhaps chatGPT has the answer.

One thing worth adding is the idea of a "money heaven".

As others have remarked that increasing the money supply beyond the productivity of a nation increases inflation eventually, but as money, financials, is an unreal thing, the value in real terms of real assets goes down to a market-demand that is backed by the ability to pay using real assets. 

I suppose all that puffed up QE is pumped out and so the difference between "inflated" or unreal, and "real", is "vaporised" i.e it's just sent to money heaven. (You know what you have to do to get to heaven?)

So this ought to deal with a lot of the debt, but of course inflation is a painful remedy.

Read More