Monday, 16 January 2023

SHOULD I BUY A GROWTH TRUST?

The discussion of private equity, what motivates the salespple. The joke. 

SMT. Scottish Mortgage Trust.

 There is a piece today on the high-conviction strategy of SMT where the managers admit to certain mistakes in 2921/22 going after exceptional growth companies like Amazon, Tesla and Tencent:

 thinking some covid-behaviour would persist more after the pandemic

 slow in recognising the significance of the deterioration in US-China relations.

But they believe in the returns from high-tech companies and think these are not about the availability or non-availability of cheap money.

 The fund's managers also talked about historian Adam Tooze’s "poly crisis" that describes where we are on endlessly-evolving supply-chain delays, the Ukraine war, US-Sino tensions and climate change. So the collapse in SMT's share price, not just inflation and the Fed's strong response.

So they hang in on the long term prospects of disruptive technologies and discount the presumably-short-term stagflationary pressures on growth companies.

Nearly half of SMT's assets are in quoted companies with net cash and of these:

 48% are profitable
 21% in net debt
 22% are unprofitable. 

Of the unprofitable, 8% generated positive free cash flow which I guess means 92% of unprofitable companies were sunk by debt expenses.

But these stats didn't include the 30% of the trust invested in unquoted companies - the long tail of private equity positions that go some way to explain why SMT shares have fallen to a 9% discount below NAV net asset value.

The Trust can have up to 30% in unlisted. They say they revalue but they also say that unlisted companies won't accept these revaluations!

Of the listed, valuations have fallen in some cases back to 2008 levels, from 7 x to 5 x sales, and prospective earnings by 10% (seems too low). They are saying: how can the shares get any cheaper? And: reflect not on current valuations but future prospects (which is a nonsense argument).

Anyway, I sold DLG, taking a big big hit, putting some into DLG, some into SMT. And it has proven profitable...fingers crossed.

Sunday, 15 January 2023

ORIGINS OF WAR IN UKRAINE

One of Rishi's ideas that is purely political is to send two tanks to Ukraine. Two!   There's little discussion on military channels of its impact on the war because it will have none.

The whole war dates back to 1996 and NATO's (America's) decision to renege on promises given to the Russian's to respect a security buffer in Eastern Europe. Expansion started in 1999.

Russia had hope for a new joint security architecture for Europe. If you add to this possible alliance, the trade opportunities (commodities and energy for technology and finished products) especially with Germany, it is easy to understand America's apprehension, as the "world hegemon".

That is how the conflict began. Other key dates: 2008 promise in invite Ukraine and Georgia to join NATO; 2014 America begins to arm Ukraine; 2021 Russia's last offer of a settlement; 2022 March Zelensky ready to accept a peace deal but Johnson, on behalf of US, tells Zelensky to reject peace and fight on.

Sad for the peoples of Europe (where 80% of Russians live).

Tuesday, 10 January 2023

US CHINA CONFLAGRATION

====

Les États-Unis « subiraient de lourdes pertes dans la guerre de Taiwan, mais la Chine risque la défaite »

La marine de Pékin serait en "pagaille", Washington perdant plus de 3 000 soldats, selon une simulation de groupe de réflexion

Des hélicoptères militaires chinois survolent l'île de Pingtan, l'un des points les plus proches de Taïwan en Chine continentale, le 4 août 2022

Une hypothétique invasion chinoise de Taïwan en 2026 échouerait mais les États-Unis perdraient deux porte-avions qui la défendent, selon la dernière simulation.

La marine chinoise serait laissée en "pagaille" tandis que Taïwan et le Japon subiraient également des pertes importantes , selon un jeu de guerre joué par un groupe de réflexion de premier plan à Washington.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) conducted one of the most complex war games yet, called The First Battle of the Next War.

It showed about 10,000 Chinese troops would be killed, with tens of thousands more becoming prisoners of war.

China would also be expected to lose about 138 ships and 155 aircraft, according to the simulation.

The US and Japan would also lose dozens of ships and hundreds of aircraft, which would "damage the US global position for many years".

It showed about 3,200 US troops would be killed in a three-week fight. The simulation was run 24 times to see who was most likely to win.

While the US would emerge victorious, in most cases the US Navy lost two aircraft carriers.

War 'not inevitable'

Taiwan would see its military "severely degraded" with all its destroyers and frigates sunk, while Japan would lose more than 100 aircraft and 26 ships, according to the report.

The report concluded a war over Taiwan was not "inevitable".

It said: “The Chinese leadership might adopt a strategy of diplomatic isolation, grey zone pressure, or economic coercion against Taiwan."

Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at CSIS, told CNN: “There’s no unclassified war game out there looking at the US-China conflict. Of the games that are unclassified, they’re usually only done once or twice."

In a large-scale war game in 2020, the Pentagon reportedly found the US risked being defeated by having its information systems knocked out.

However, in a later war game, the US Air Force secured victory.

Monday, 9 January 2023

WHY THE WEST IS BEST

The top race, according to average achievements/capita, must surely be the Je*s.

Then come the European whites, Anglo-Saxons on top. Why?

1. We doubled life expectancy by introducing antibiotics insecticides and vaccines to the world. Nine out of 10 Indonesians would not be here today if it hadn't been for that !

2. Holland did not get rich by pillaging Indonesia, or maybe it did, but Holland was already rich and powerful, which is how it was able to colonise Indy.

And in so doing, Holland gave value to the spices they could grow there, that the people who lived there would have passed over !!

3. Stupidly you might say, we opened our Society to the whole world and people wherever they are can more or less come and go freely in our country - you imagine being given a passport to live in Saudi Arabia or China (not that you would want to). So successful has the West been that everyone wants to come and live in our system and no one, not even "the boat people", want to live in Indonesia, as you explained to me !!!

4. It seems that the West is still able to dominate the world due to its Greek and Roman inheritance (pre-dates Islam, but influenced Islam, so we have some common roots), its Christian values, and its rationality.

I mean reason over feeling, rationality over mysticism !!!!

5. We have energy, we are dynamic and innovative, we have (had) successful economies) and that energy and wealth is turned into military force, albeit far too aggresively in America's case. America dominates the world. America dominates Europe !!!!!

6. We are independent, responsible, innovative. We make and follow good rules and institutions. We have or had capitalism, not communism, we separate religion from government !!!!!!

Finish, ok :-)

Sunday, 8 January 2023

AMERICA APPRECIATES FULL WELL WHAT IT IS DOING

9 January 2023

I would love that people appreciate the real cause of this war.
As a patriotic Englishman, I care and I want the best for my country and for Europe as a whole (which incidentally includes that part of Russia where 80% of Russians live).



It was made plain to America as long ago as 1997

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=huL4mTx55Kw&feature=youtu.be




Wednesday, 4 January 2023

THE GOALS AND STRATEGIES OF AMERICA, RUSSIA AND CHINA

4 January 2023

America

American policy as explained by Mearsheimer is to remain regional hegemon in The West; with no hegemons in other regions. This is the brutal and ruthless truth, but an ideological soapy cover story is provided by America's liberal democracy rhetoric.

Reality is America will tolerate neither Russia nor Germany in Europe; nor China in Asia. The goals of these latter are national independence and full sovereignty, therefore since America wants to dominate and since Russia and China will resist, ultimately negotiation is impossible and outcomes can only be decided by fighting.

Russia

Russia is attempting to balance the power of America / NATO. Russia is attempting to hold together and protect Russian minorities. It isn't bent on recreating Soviet or Czarist Russia, only survival of its nation, culture and people: the fatherland.

Military power rests on economic. Economic on wealth and population size.

While Russia is not a serious threat
https://youtu.be/PLBc2KWTrck

China

Nor really is China. China has the former (growing wealth) because America gave it priviledged access to its middle class, but the population of China is in free fall.

Nothing to worry about then, according to Peter Zeihan
https://youtu.be/7Me2G6FJZMI

But then there's Taiwan
https://youtu.be/PLBc2KWTrck

THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR BEAUTIFUL BLUE PLANET

4 January 2023

America and NATO have been provoking Russia for decades. The EU - Merkel, Hollande - have weakly, blindly, allowed America to bully them.

America's paranoid leadership sees a weakened Europe (esp. Russia & Germany) as in its interests - take out potential peer competitors - but The West's real collective best interests are currently in trade deals and an alliance with Russia, countering the threat from China, promoting security and prosperity.

I'd imagine America is trying to break up Russia, move in to that country and contain China from the North.

That will never work, it's more American insecurity. This war against Russia will be yet another American disaster and its biggest, possibly its last, disaster yet.

The irony is, we want the American Order, but without America's crazy foreign policy elite. Instead, the world is moving to two Orders and perpetual war, until life on this planet is exhausted, wrecked, destroyed.

Monday, 2 January 2023

THE VIRUS: THE CHINESE HAVE BEEN PANICKED INTO RUNNING THE EXPERIMENT THE WEST REJECTED

2 January 2023

https://www.ft.com/content/fb879510-c2bb-4a04-8e36-182078ae15ec?sharetype=blocked

https://www.ibtimes.com/new-covid-model-predicts-over-1-million-deaths-china-through-2023-3648316

Opening up was delayed pending Xi's reelection. China's zero-COVID policy may have been effective at keeping earlier variants of the virus at bay, but the high transmissibility of Omicron variants made it impossible to sustain. Public protests were decisive in getting the leadership to understand this.

You've got to ask what was the point of three years of lockdowns? The lack of preparedness makes opening up seem like a panicked response to growing civil unrest.

Why were the Chinese unable to develop an effective vaccine? mRNA technology has been around in the West for 30 years. And if they couldn't build, however humiliating, for the sake of their people, they should really have bought production lines.

What is interesting is that China is running the experiment the West rejected: herd immunity through natural selection. But even here, the West's plan was nuanced: it was to manage the process by openings followed by shutdowns when the infection rate became too intense, thus slowing adaption. The Chinese seem to have thrown caution to the wind.

Sunday, 1 January 2023

END GAMES IN UKRAINE

1 January 2023

The Wagner has taken on the mission of destroying the Ukrainian army in Bakmut (spelling). The purpose is to demilitarise Ukraine* - looks like this will mean wrecking the whole country (energy, comms), whilst the popn flees to Russia or Europe (Poland).

*Denazify, no NATO, autonomy for Russian East - was built by Catherine the Great late 18C.

Most likely scenario

Then Ukraine will fall to Poland in the West, back to Russia in the East (Novorossiya: to Odessa and round to Southern Transnistria is possible).

Leaving a landlocked rump that will fall under Russian influence.

Fine mess the Americans got us into.

Other scenarios

Stalemate and perpetual war. With strains on EU and NATO risking their breakup.

Ukraine starts defeating Russia and Russia responds with nuclear in Ukraine only. NATO America would almost certainly not respond, fearing MAD.

NATO America enters Ukraine. Here, could get MAD.

As I say, fine mess the Americans got us into

PENAL UNITS

1 January 2023

An interesting bit of gossip, this article, using criminals not without precedent in Russia nor closer to home, common practise throughout history....other examples

The Fr foreign legion was originally a fighting force made up of criminals and other undesirables. Its purpose being to remove disruptive elements from society and put them to use fighting the enemies of France.

Strafbattalions in Nazi Germany were created from prisoners.

WW2 amnesty was offered for 10 missions as the rear Il-2 gunner (unprotected, 8x death rate compared with Il-2 pilots),

Also for 10 mine field clearing missions.

The general area of interest is "penal units". Were sent to the most dangerous of front lines.

Then there's Australia...and colonial administrators generally.             

UKRAINE: YOUR THOUGHTS (NOT ON A POSTCARD PLEASE) ARE REQUESTED

1 January 2023

Ukraine runs sorties deep into Russia daily, but if it starts with American weapons or NATO troops, that would provoke a third world war.

For the moment, it is "only" a proxy war. Ukraine is losing its army, pretty soon if this continues it will be dismembered, whether you agree or not.

How much better would be peace. If you have Russia as a neighbour, it's like being in bed with an elephant: better take care! (That's just a fact, whether you like it or not.)

The Americans are on to another disaster here, quite possibly their biggest and their last. And they've dragged down Europe with them.

What we are seeing is Russia looking East, a bipolar world, two reserve currencies, perpetual war.

How much better off we'd all be if we could winkle America out of Europe (I know, I know....) and sew up a trade deal with Moscow.

====
 Try Alexander Mercouris for daily news