Pakistan is involved because it fears Indian influence in Afghanistan. Pakistan's fears or muslim aggression, see it how you will, have driven it to be the aggressor in its relations with India. And it has mostly come off worse - biggest example is its losing east Pakistan. Time wounds all heals.
The original sin was letting princely Kashmir and Jammu choose independence or absorption into India. Kashmir was a hindu mi ority governing a muslim majority. Pakistan sent its soldiers in, obliging Kashmir to seek the protection of India. Pakistan lost that one too.
Now Pakistan is replaying the war. The Afghani leader cannot fight Pakistan on his own, so he'll likely seek assistance - from India? From China this time maybe.
Many of the Taliban fighters are mercenaires with experience from Syria where they were originally Saddam Hussein's old guard, renamed Al Qaeda. They were ISIS.
Bashir al Assad and Putin knew how to deal with these Sunni extremists. The Americans should have supported the Shia, but of course they had to go with various anti-Iran groupings. Big mistake.
And where did OBL hail from? And who funds the madrassas? And how did the mujahideen who fought off the Russians, mutate into the Taliban, who are wahhabists, if it wasnt money from the House of Saud?
If NATO or the States and its allies had wanted to take the fight to the real Taliban, they'd have carpet bombed Pashtun northern Pakistan and south west Afghanistan. And impoverished the Gulf by abandoning fossil fuels long long ago (technology is basic but oil companies werent ready).
The West ("The West") would have done better to keep things simple and to have had all this out with Pakistan from the start. And the House of Saud before that (Death of a Princess). But Pakistan and India both have the bomb and the House of Saud, which captured Arabia in 1928, has the oil.
Quite a tangled web.
The guy was advised of this but ignored as cannot listen or understand.
His intelligence was completely wrong: Biden believed the Taliban would not be in a position to mount a blitzkrieg return and said so.
Planning and timing was zero: for example, why withdraw at a time when the enemy is assembled instead of waiting for winter or why were the ancillaries not prepared and assembled for extraction to America or the airport closed and patrolled?
Execution was totally and utterly incompetent, from the Green Zone to the Airport.
Communication before and after has been zero.
====
The Taliban, according to Western media, do not exactly have a good record and Western public does not take comfort in their reassurances about Sharia.
Subjects: Covering (hijab), divorce laws, legal age of marriage, custody of children, polygamy, employment, travel, place of residence, honour killing.
Countries under sharia, women can be stoned to death.
The reality today is that the extremes of Koranic guidance have thankfully been overtiden by statute. But Al Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban, all derive from Saudi wahabism, a back-to-basics attempt to "purify" the religion (a phase all religions go through) and build a world caliphate along 7th century lines.
Quite frightening. The enemy is not so much Allah and Islam, it is Man and the House of Saud and Pakistan.
Live and Let Live, I say.
====
I believe Pakistan's involvement flows from the House of Saud setting up madrassas (koranic schools) and its funding.
While Pakistan has well founded anxieties concerning India dating back to partition, Kashmir, Jamma.
So Saudi money funds wahabist expansion.
The West is held back by dependence on Arabian oil (controlled by the Saudi family) and India and Pakistan's possession of the bomb.
Some extremely clever manoeuvring is needed to extricate from these massive mistakes of the past. Hope the old goat in the White House (the last two presidents in fact) has not signed The West's death warrant.
Virile new leadership is needed if America is to remain top hegemon.
====
As our thoughts deepen - for example, will the Taliban have the bomb? Does this open Pakistan and Afghanistan to China's Belt and Road strategy for "World Domination" - the utter folly of what Biden has done will break confidence in the States.
Virile new leadership - peaceful though assertive - is desperately needed.