Showing posts with label #Israel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #Israel. Show all posts

Friday, 2 August 2024

CONTROL MECHANISMS: HOW ISRAEL RUNS AMERICA'S FOREIGN POLICY

2 August 2024

HOW THE ISRAEL LOBBY CONTROLS AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY

This article explores (a) methods employed by The Israel Lobby also known as "the donor class" to shape U.S. foreign policy in favour of Israel - various direct lobbying efforts, educational trips, grassroots mobilisation in favour of or against members of Congress or candidates, Influence through think tanks and the media and (b) top donors whose contributions fund these methods.

Here is why we should be concerned: the "donor class" is raising concerns of a major conflagration in the Middle East that risks destroying our civilisation.


1. Overview of "The Israel Lobby"

Authors and Premise: John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt authored "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy." The book argues that the Israel lobby has a significant impact on U.S. foreign policy, often to the detriment of U.S. national interests.

2. Mechanisms of Influence on Congress

- Campaign Contributions

  - Financial Support: Pro-Israel political action committees (PACs) such as AIPAC, Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI), and the United Democracy Project (UDP) provide substantial financial contributions to congressional campaigns. This financial backing ensures that candidates who support pro-Israel policies have the necessary resources to win elections (TrackAIPAC.com).

Worth noting that these campaign contributions are not just large sums of money handed over into a candidate's campaign pot. They are sums that are promised but held back by the donor, remaining in the donor's bank account pending satisfactory performance in congress.

- Lobbying Efforts

  - Direct Lobbying: AIPAC and other pro-Israel organisations engage in extensive lobbying efforts, meeting with members of Congress and their staff to advocate for pro-Israel legislation. This lobbying includes providing talking points, arranging meetings with Israeli officials, and organising events. These efforts help to ensure that lawmakers are well-informed and aligned with pro-Israel policies (Mearsheimer and Walt).

Educational Trips

  - Sponsored Trips to Israel: Pro-Israel groups frequently sponsor trips to Israel for U.S. legislators and their aides. These trips are designed to provide a favourable view of Israel’s security situation and to strengthen personal and political ties. By experiencing Israel firsthand, lawmakers are more likely to develop a sympathetic understanding of its geopolitical challenges (TrackAIPAC.com).

- Grassroots Mobilisation

  - Constituent Pressure: The Israel lobby mobilises grassroots support, encouraging the Congressman's or Congresswoman's constituents to contact their representative to support pro-Israel positions. This grassroots pressure can significantly influence congressional decision-making, as legislators seek to align with the views of their voters (Mearsheimer and Walt).

Influence through Think Tanks and Media

- Think Tanks

  - Policy Advocacy: Pro-Israel think tanks such as the Washington Institute for Near East Policy produce research and policy recommendations that support Israel's interests. These think tanks provide intellectual backing for pro-Israel policies and influence public debate by framing issues in ways that are favourable to Israel (Mearsheimer and Walt).

3. Media Influence

  - Shaping Public Opinion: The Israel lobby works to influence media coverage to ensure favourable reporting on Israel and its policies. Positive media coverage can shape public opinion, which in turn influences congressional attitudes. By maintaining a positive image of Israel in the media, the lobby helps create a political environment conducive to pro-Israel legislation (TrackAIPAC.com).

4. Political Consequences

- Election Support and Opposition

  - Endorsements and Funding: The Israel lobby supports candidates who are favourable to Israel and opposes those who are not. This includes providing funding to pro-Israel candidates and backing primary challengers against incumbents who are critical of Israel. By influencing electoral outcomes, the lobby ensures that a significant number of U.S. Congress members support policies favourable to the Israeli government (Mearsheimer and Walt).

- Legislative Outcomes

  - Policy Impact: The combined efforts of lobbying, campaign contributions, grassroots mobilisation, and media influence and framing, result in strong congressional support for Israel-related legislation. This support often translates into significant U.S. military and financial aid - $3.2 billion annual routine funding plus special funding - to Israel, as well as favourable diplomatic policies. The lobby's influence ensures that U.S. foreign policy decisions are consistently aligned with Israeli interests (TrackAIPAC.com).

5. Criticisms and Controversies

- Allegations of Dual Passports, Dual Loyalty

  - Criticism of the Argument: Critics argue that Mearsheimer and Walt’s claims can be perceived as suggesting dual loyalty among American Jews, a point that has generated significant controversy and accusations of anti-Semitism. 

It is very important to note however that many congressmen hold dual American and Israeli passports and it is also very important not to confuse anti-Zionism, a semi-ideology, with anti-semitism, an ethnicity that includes Jews and Muslims, also Christian, of Middle-Eastern extraction. The Israel lobby is not a Jewish lobby per se.

The authors contend that their critique is aimed at the lobby’s influence on policy, not at Jewish Americans as a group (Mearsheimer and Walt).

- Debate Over Influence

  - : There is ongoing debate about the extent of the Israel lobby's influence on U.S. foreign policy. Some argue that the lobby is simply one of many legitimate interest groups that shape policy, while others contend that its influence is disproportionately large and that it employs tactics damaging of democracy. The book highlights the lobby’s success in securing substantial U.S. aid and favourable policies for Israel, illustrating its significant impact (TrackAIPAC.com).

Conclusion


"The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" by John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt argues that the Israel lobby uses various means such as campaign contributions, lobbying efforts, educational trips, grassroots mobilisation, think tank support, threats to undermine a candidate's grassroot support, and media influence to garner and direct strong congressional support for Israel. 

This support often results in substantial U.S. financial and military aid and favourable policies toward Israel. The book has sparked significant debate and controversy regarding the nature and extent of the lobby's influence.

This article is written on the basis of information available prior to October 7th. The events since then have sharpened the analysis of Israel's influence on congress.

References

- Mearsheimer, John J., and Stephen M. Walt. "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy."
- TrackAIPAC.com.
- Various reviews and analyses of the book, including those found in reputable publications such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, and certain academic journals.

6. The Donor Class - membership

Here are five notable members of the donor class who have made significant financial contributions to pro-Israel lobbying efforts, along with evidence of their contributions:

Michael Bloomberg:

   - Contribution: $19.3 million to Democrats in the 2020 election cycle.
   - Details: Michael Bloomberg, former mayor of New York City and founder of Bloomberg LP, has been a substantial donor to Democratic candidates and causes. His contributions include significant funding aimed at supporting pro-Israel policies through various political action committees and direct donations.
   - Source: The Times of Israel Article "Meet the Donor Class

Jeffrey and Janine Yass:

   - Contribution: Over $13 million, primarily to Republicans.
   - Details: Jeffrey Yass, co-founder of the Susquehanna International Group, is known for his libertarian views and substantial financial support to pro-Israel candidates and causes. His contributions include donations to PACs and direct support to candidates who align with pro-Israel policies.

James and Marilyn Simons:

   - Contribution: Nearly $21 million to Democrats.
   - Details: James Simons, founder of Renaissance Technologies, and his wife Marilyn are significant donors to Democratic candidates and pro-Israel lobbying efforts. Their contributions support a range of political and philanthropic causes, including those promoting Israel's interests.
   - Source: as above

Henry and Marsha Laufer:

   - Contribution: $11.8 million to Democrats.
   - Details: Henry Laufer, a former executive at Renaissance Technologies, and his wife Marsha have donated substantial amounts to Democratic candidates and pro-Israel causes. Their contributions help fund political campaigns and organisations that support Israel's interests in U.S. policy.
   - Source: The Times of Israel

Paul Singer:

   - Contribution: $8.8 million to Republicans.
   - Details: Paul Singer, founder of Elliott Management Corporation, is a prominent donor to Republican candidates and pro-Israel causes. He has been instrumental in supporting pro-Israel lobbying efforts and political campaigns that align with his views.
   - Source: as above

These individuals are notable for their significant financial contributions, which help shape U.S. foreign policy in favour of Israel through various lobbying efforts and political donations.

Saturday, 9 March 2024

A REVISED ZIONIST MANIFESTO

9 March 2024

This is a manifesto for a revised Zionist philosophy. It is intended for integrating into a constution for a modern state. The Consitution will articulate the concept of a  one-state or two-state solution, chosen according to results of a referendum, along with assurances of equal rights for all citizens, as anticipated in the Balfour Declaration. Governance would be overseen by the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

So this is an updated and revised Zionist Manifesto. It is fit to fold into the Constitution of a modern liberal social-democratic nation, operating in a post-colonial world. 

This Manifesto is articulated and endorsed by well-intentioned people of the Jewish faith. It sets goals for prosperity, progress and justice at home and abroad, together with respect for the environment.

This revision to Zionist philosophy reflects a comprehensive, practical and inclusive approach to nation-building.

The Neo-Zionist Manifesto, 
rev. 01, March 2024


---

The Updated Zionist Manifesto

This document lays out the foundational ideals and aspirations of the Zionist movement, dedicated to the creation of a Jewish non-exclusive homeland, whilst recognising the evolving context of our times and the aspirations of all peoples in the region.

1. Foundation of a Democratic Inclusive State

We affirm the establishment of a sovereign  state within the historic boundaries of Palestine, delineated from the Mediterranean Sea to the River Jordan, and from the Negev Desert to the Lebanese frontier, committed to peace and security for all its inhabitants and respectful of all religious commumities.

2. National Unity and Cultural Revival

Our movement is rooted in the unification of Jewish people, the revival of the Hebrew language, and the promotion of our rich historical and cultural heritage, shaping a society that values diversity and historical consciousness.

3. Clear Geographic Demarcation

We pledge to define our state's borders clearly, ensuring a secure, recognised, and sustainable homeland for the nation, which includes people of the Jewish faith, while respecting the territorial integrity and political sovereignty of neighbouring states.

4. Commitment to Inclusivity and Equality

The envisaged state is a beacon of democracy, guaranteeing equal rights, freedoms, and opportunities for all its citizens, irrespective of their religious or ethnic affiliations, under a Revised Constitution that embodies the principles of this Manifesto.

5. Two-State Solution and International Peace

While our core mission focuses on the establishment of a national homeland for the different communities living within the agreed geographic boundaries, we acknowledge the broader regional aspiration for peace and stability, which includes support for a two-state solution, recognising the legitimate national aspirations of both Jewish and Palestinian peoples within internationally, possibly identical, agreed borders.

Any one-state solution will express power-sharing arrangements that grant the possibility equally to all citizens to participate directly, through vote-from-home or through a system of party representation, in a modern democracy.

6. Economic Development and Social Justice

We are dedicated to building an economy that enhances the quality of life for all residents, driven by innovation, fairness, and a commitment to eradicating inequality, ensuring social justice and respecting the environment.

7. Global Solidarity and Legal Oversight

We seek to fortify international alliances, advocating for global recognition and support, and affirming our commitment to uphold the principles of international law, with the expected Revised Constitution containing egalitarian mandates subject to oversight by the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

This manifesto reaffirms our unwavering dedication to establishing a land which provides for people of different faiths and exemplifies democratic values, social justice, peaceful coexistence and planetary survival, ensuring a prosperous and secure future for all its inhabitants, in harmony with nature, the global community and international legal standards.







Friday, 1 March 2024

HOW DOES ISRAEL JUSTIFY ITS ACTIONS IN GAZA

1 March 2024

Let's take a look at the situation in Gaza and Israel and consider the various justifications in defense of Israel's actions: 

1. Israel is a democracy

Democracies respect human rights and international law. 

Being a democracy does not grant a state the right to bomb its neighbours. 

Israel's democratic status is not applicable to the Palestinians under its control.

2. IDF operations limit civilian casualties 

The IDF minimises civilian deaths by warning civilians of impending bombings and advising civilians of safe areas where they can find refuge. 

Despite these warnings, the high civilian death toll and the indiscriminate nature of the bombings, indicate a failure to protect non-combatants. 

Further, so-called safe areas are bombed and out-of-play areas like hospitals and schools and mosques are bombed.

3. Israel is acting in self-defence

While self-defence is legitimate, the disproportionate response and the indiscriminate bombing exceed the bounds of lawful self-defence, constituting war crimes.

4. The objective is to eliminte the cause: Hamas

Yet, despite prolonged military efforts, Hamas is still intact. The strategy is ineffective and risks enhancing Hamas's standing among Palestinians.

5. Israel is combating terrorism

The justification that the bombings are necessary to combat terrorism is false.

 Israel's violence, far from defeating terrorism, risks instead fostering resentment and the desire for revenge, nourishing a breeding ground for still more terrorism, and perpetuating and deepening the historic cycle of violence. 

6. Israel is liberating the Palestinian people from Hamas control

This is a cynical argument. Hamas was voted into office in 2006. 

It is callous mockery to  claim liberation through the killing of the very people supposedly being liberated.

7. Civilian casualties are inevitable in any war

There is a distinction between legitimate wartime casualties and the unlawful killing of civilians, which constitutes a war crime. 

The ratio of civilian to combattant deaths is higher than in WW2 and considerably higher than in Ukraine.

8. Crticism of Israeli actions is nothing more than anti-semitism

Labelling criticisms of Israel's policies as antisemitic is intended to stifle legitimate debate and distract from what is really going on ie from Israel's true nefarious intentions.

The main point to see is how focusing on 7 October ignores the history of Israel's enduring and provocative intention to seize the land of Palestinians and clear it of Palestinians, under the ideology of Zionism and the justification of legitimate self-defence, security and a sahe homeland for the Jewish people. 

What we need is a nuanced understanding of the conflict that considers the historical pre-7-October context and contemporary post 7-October events. These complexities, rather than excuses for violence through simplified narratives or invalid justifications.

Links

https://youtu.be/l4D-ya7CWvM?si=A9t0gJ3MfsdX6-3e

https://youtu.be/Dgyh8NX7pZU?si=Mr4fnUNy0cFYoYN4

https://youtu.be/r4ss3ptSlDw?si=t6WP_ZDt6pYz-Qaz