HOW CHINA'S CONTINUING RISE IS RESHAPING THE WORLD ECONOMY PT 3 of 3

22 June 2026

PTS 1 & 2

https://www.livingintheair.org/2026/06/chinas-historical-worldview-empire.html

Overview

China Shock 2.0 may prove more disruptive than the first China Shock. The original wave delivered cheap consumer goods that lowered inflation and raised living standards across the West. The new wave involves electric vehicles, batteries for EVs etc, solar panels, robotics and advanced manufacturing. What once appeared to be a source of inexpensive imports has evolved into a direct competitor to the industrial heartlands of Europe, Japan and North America. The central question is no longer whether China can manufacture. It is whether the rest of the developed world can continue competing with China's scale, efficiency and state-backed industrial strategy.

The transition from cheap-export China Shock 1.0 to high-tech China Shock 2.0

---

1. China Shock 1.0: The Great Deflationary Wave

China Shock 1.0 began after China's accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001. Hundreds of millions of Chinese workers became integrated into the global economy. Factories across China produced enormous quantities of low-cost consumer goods, ranging from clothing and footwear to toys, furniture and household items.

The effect was profound. A huge increase in global manufacturing capacity created downward pressure on prices. Consumers in Europe and North America enjoyed access to cheaper products, which effectively increased purchasing power and improved living standards.

Inflation remained unusually low throughout much of the early twenty-first century. Many economists argue that China's manufacturing expansion was one of the most important factors behind this phenomenon.

The benefits, however, were unevenly distributed. Consumers gained, but many manufacturing regions suffered factory closures, job losses and long-term economic decline. The result was a politically complex situation. While workers in industrial sectors in rust-belt constituencies especially, faced disruption, multinational companies and consumers often benefited.

Glossary

China Shock - The economic disruption caused by China's rapid integration into global trade and manufacturing.

World Trade Organization (WTO) - An international organisation that establishes and enforces rules governing global trade.

Deflation - A fall in prices across an economy or sector.

Purchasing Power - The quantity of goods and services that can be bought with a given amount of money.

Globalisation - The increasing integration of economies, trade networks and production systems across national borders.

China's unprecedented trade surplus as a share of the rest-of-the-world GDP

Chinese Trade Over World GDP ex. China

Trade Surplus as a Share of Rest-of-World GDP

---

2. China Shock 2.0: Moving Up the Value Chain

China today is no longer primarily a producer of inexpensive consumer goods. It has moved into advanced manufacturing sectors traditionally dominated by developed economies.

Chinese firms now compete in electric vehicles, battery technology, solar panels, telecommunications equipment, robotics and sophisticated electronics. Companies such as BYD have emerged as globally competitive producers whose products increasingly receive favourable reviews on quality and performance.

Modern Chinese factories are often highly automated. Some operate with minimal human intervention, sometimes described as "lights out" manufacturing because production continues without workers present.

A key driver behind this transition has been deliberate industrial policy. Chinese authorities have directed investment towards strategic manufacturing sectors while attempting to reduce dependence on property-led growth.

The result is a manufacturing sector that continues to expand even as domestic demand remains relatively weak. Unlike the first China Shock, China's export growth is no longer accompanied by rapidly rising imports from the rest of the world.

This creates a more challenging environment for competing economies because Chinese exports are increasing without generating equivalent opportunities for foreign producers.

Glossary

Value Chain - The sequence of activities involved in producing a good or service, from raw materials to finished product.

Industrial Policy - Government actions designed to support specific industries or economic sectors.

Advanced Manufacturing - Production using sophisticated technology, automation and engineering.

Automation - The use of machines and software to perform tasks with minimal human intervention.

Trade Imbalance - A situation where a country's exports and imports differ substantially.

---

3. Germany: The First Major Casualty?

Few countries illustrate the challenge of China Shock 2.0 more clearly than Germany.

For decades, Germany built its prosperity on exporting high-quality manufactured goods. German companies became world leaders in automobiles, industrial machinery, engineering equipment and precision manufacturing.

That model is now under pressure.

Chinese firms increasingly compete in many of the same sectors where German companies once enjoyed technological advantages. The automotive industry provides perhaps the clearest example. While German vehicle exports have stagnated, Chinese vehicle exports have expanded dramatically.

The challenge extends beyond cars. China is increasingly competitive in industrial machinery, renewable energy systems and advanced manufacturing technologies.

Germany faces a strategic dilemma. Its prosperity depends heavily on global trade, yet its traditional export strengths are increasingly challenged by Chinese competitors.

Germany's exports stalled, China's surged

Net exports' contribution to growth as a % of domestic GD GDP

China's car exports have skyrocketed

Glossary

Export-Oriented Economy - An economy that relies heavily on selling goods and services abroad.

Industrial Base - The manufacturing and productive capacity of a nation.

Competitive Advantage - A characteristic that allows a firm or country to outperform rivals.

Precision Engineering - The design and manufacture of highly accurate machinery and components.

Productivity - Output produced per unit of labour or capital.

---

4. Tariffs, Trade Wars and the Return of Industrial Competition

The economic consequences of China Shock 2.0 have increasingly become political.

Trade balance on machinery, electronics, transport equipment and medical equipment

The United States responded through tariffs and trade restrictions during the US-China trade dispute. European governments are now debating similar measures.

Supporters of tariffs argue that Chinese manufacturers benefit from advantages unavailable to most foreign competitors. These include subsidised financing, state support, industrial planning and currency management.

Critics respond that tariffs ultimately increase costs for consumers and can trigger retaliation, reducing overall economic efficiency.

The debate reflects a deeper tension between two competing objectives.

One objective seeks maximum economic efficiency through free trade.

The other prioritises national resilience, strategic independence and industrial capability.

As geopolitical competition intensifies, many governments appear increasingly willing to sacrifice some economic efficiency in exchange for greater industrial security.

Glossary

Tariff - A tax imposed on imported goods.

Trade War - A cycle of tariffs and trade restrictions between countries.

Subsidy - Financial support provided by a government to businesses or industries.

Currency Management - Government actions intended to influence exchange rates.

Economic Efficiency - The production of goods and services at the lowest possible cost.

---

5. Manufacturing and National Power

A broader lesson emerges from the China Shock debate.

Throughout history, major powers have generally possessed strong manufacturing capabilities. Britain's rise was linked to the Industrial Revolution. America's emergence as a superpower was reinforced by its extraordinary industrial capacity during the twentieth century.

Manufacturing creates more than economic output. It generates technical expertise, supply chains, skilled labour, engineering capabilities and strategic resilience.

Financial wealth alone cannot produce ships, aircraft, semiconductors or energy infrastructure.

This has revived an old question in economics and geopolitics:

What constitutes real national wealth?

One view emphasises financial markets, consumption and services.

Another emphasises productive capacity and the ability to manufacture essential goods.

China's rise has forced many policymakers to reconsider the balance between these two models.

Glossary

Industrial Revolution - The period of technological and manufacturing transformation beginning in Britain during the eighteenth century.

Productive Capacity - The ability of an economy to produce goods and services.

Strategic Resilience - The ability to withstand economic, military or political shocks.

Supply Chain - The network involved in producing and delivering goods.

National Power - The ability of a state to influence events through economic, military and political means.

---

6. The Globalisation Trade-Off

The story of China Shock is ultimately the story of globalisation itself.

Globalisation delivered lower prices, greater consumer choice and higher living standards for hundreds of millions of people.

At the same time, it weakened some domestic industries, increased dependence on foreign suppliers and contributed to social and political tensions in many developed countries.

China Shock 1.0 largely benefited consumers.

China Shock 2.0 challenges producers.

The first wave transformed retail shelves.

The second wave is transforming industrial competition.

Whether the future brings deeper global integration or a more fragmented world economy remains uncertain. What is clear is that the era in which China was merely the world's low-cost workshop has ended. China is now competing for leadership across many of the most advanced sectors of the global economy.

Glossary

Fragmentation - The breaking apart of previously integrated economic systems.

Economic Sovereignty - The ability of a nation to control its own economic policies and development.

De-Globalisation - A reduction in international economic integration.

Industrial Strategy - A coordinated plan to strengthen specific sectors of an economy.

Multipolar Economy - A global economy with several major centres of economic power rather than one dominant power.

---

References

World Trade Organization: https://www.wto.org

OECD Trade Statistics: https://www.oecd.org/trade

International Monetary Fund: https://www.imf.org

World Bank Data: https://data.worldbank.org

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development: https://unctad.org

Brad Setser, Council on Foreign Relations: https://www.cfr.org

China Customs Trade Statistics: http://english.customs.gov.cn

German Federal Statistical Office: https://www.destatis.de/en/home.html

Read More

CHINA'S HISTORICAL WORLDVIEW: EMPIRE, ORDER AND CONTINUITY ; THE RISE OF CHINA PTS 1 & 2 of 3

19 June 2026

INTRO

This is a geopolitical interpretation that uses Chinese history to explain contemporary Chinese behaviour. 

Cts 1 to 7 is a first part focused on the historical narrative. The second part, Ct 8, relates China's rise to power.

PART ONE

Short History of China

As it concerns the West

Part 1 - a potted history of China and its relations with the West

1. China's Historical Worldview: Empire, Order and Continuity

China is one of the world's oldest continuous civilisations. What is civilization ? When we speak of "high civilisations", we speak of writing, developed mathematics and extreme attention to the cycling of the planets through the constellations - this cycling is the great critical factor in the transformation of consciousness at this time as it allowed the early Chinese leaderships from Qin onwards to make records, precise records, of the passage of the planets through the constellation. And so since its political unification under the Qin Dynasty in 221 BCE, successive Chinese governments have generally viewed the country as a unified civilisation-state rather than simply a nation-state.

A central feature of Chinese political culture has been the pursuit of order, stability and prosperity through hierarchical relationships. Influenced by Confucian philosophy, Chinese society traditionally emphasised duty, respect for authority, family obligations and social harmony.

Unlike many Western political traditions, which often stress individual rights and competition between centres of power, the Chinese tradition has generally prioritised collective stability and strong central authority.

Chinese leaders frequently draw lessons from thousands of years of dynastic history. They study how periods of strength and prosperity were achieved and how dynasties declined through internal division, financial weakness, foreign invasion or natural disasters.

Confucianism – A philosophical tradition emphasising social harmony, hierarchy, duty and moral leadership.

Dynasty – A ruling family or governing order that controls a state for an extended period.

Civilisation - A settled and enduring cultural Order through which a people express a shared identity, history and worldview. According to Joseph Campbell, civilisations are held together by common myths, symbols and stories that give meaning to life and connect individuals from birth to a larger community. These cultural values become visible in cities, architecture, institutions and traditions that survive across generations.

The Chinese case illustrates this very nicely. The continuity is not merely political. Dynasties came and went, but the civilisation remained visible in its cities, writing system, bureaucracy, family structures, philosophies, monuments and collective memory. That is why many Chinese thinkers describe China as a civilisation-state rather than simply a nation-state.

Unified Civilisation-State - A political entity that sees itself not merely as a nation created by modern borders, but as the continuation of an ancient civilisation, culture and historical tradition. In the Chinese view, the state derives legitimacy not only from government institutions but also from thousands of years of shared history, language, customs and collective memory.

 Morphology - The physical form and structure of buildings or cities. China displays a highly legible civilisational "language" in its vernacular architecture, shaped by imperial continuity, philosophical ordering principles, and climate adaptation across vast regional variation and dynasties. The concretisation of this (!) can be found in the rooflines, materials, window and door treatments, ornaments and motifs, in the town and street pattern - these five features of a built environment usually reveal the civilisation, region, and historical period within seconds. China's vernacular architecture is no exception and is proof of a millenial civilisation.

The high civilisations of the river valleys

---

2. The Tribute System and China's Regional Influence

For much of the period between roughly 200 BCE and the nineteenth century, China operated within what historians call the tribute system.

Under this arrangement, neighbouring states acknowledged China's pre-eminent position in East Asia through diplomatic missions and symbolic gestures of respect. In return, they received trade opportunities, political recognition and access to Chinese markets.

The system was not an empire in the European colonial sense. Rather than direct occupation, influence was often exercised through diplomacy, economic relationships and political prestige.

Chinese rulers generally regarded this arrangement as a practical method of maintaining regional stability while recognising differences in power between states.

Tribute System – A historical diplomatic framework in which neighbouring states acknowledged Chinese primacy in exchange for trade and political benefits.

---

3. Strategy and the Influence of Sun Tzu

Chinese strategic thinking has long been influenced by the military philosopher Sun Tzu and his work, The Art of War.

One of its most famous principles is that the highest form of victory is achieved without direct warfare. Success comes through preparation, deception, diplomacy, economic leverage and psychological pressure rather than battlefield confrontation.

This strategic tradition remains influential in discussions about Chinese statecraft and foreign policy.

The Art of War – A classical Chinese text on strategy, conflict and statecraft.

---

4. The Century of Humiliation

One of the most important historical memories in modern China is the period often called the "Century of Humiliation".

This period began with the First Opium War in 1839 and lasted until the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949.

During the nineteenth century, China was forced into a series of unequal treaties with foreign powers including Britain, France, Russia and Japan. Hong Kong was ceded to Britain, foreign powers gained special commercial privileges, and Chinese sovereignty was repeatedly compromised.

China also suffered devastating internal conflicts, including the Taiping Rebellion, one of the deadliest civil wars in human history.

The humiliation deepened after China's defeat by Japan in 1895, which resulted in the loss of Taiwan. Further trauma followed the Boxer Rebellion, foreign occupation of Beijing, Japanese expansion into Manchuria and the atrocities of the Second Sino-Japanese War.

These experiences remain central to modern Chinese national identity and help explain the importance Chinese leaders place on sovereignty, territorial integrity and national strength.

Century of Humiliation – The period from roughly 1839 to 1949 during which China suffered foreign intervention, military defeats and political fragmentation.

---

5. Civil War and the Division over Taiwan

Following Japan's defeat in 1945, China resumed its civil war between the Chinese Communist Party and the Nationalist Kuomintang government.

The Communists emerged victorious in 1949 and established the People's Republic of China on the mainland. The Nationalist government retreated to Taiwan, where it continued to govern separately.

Since then, the status of Taiwan has remained one of the most important and sensitive issues in Chinese politics.

The government in Beijing maintains that there is only one China and that Taiwan is part of it. Different political groups within Taiwan hold differing views regarding independence, reunification and the island's future relationship with the mainland.

Kuomintang (KMT) – The Chinese Nationalist Party that governed China before losing the civil war to the Communists.

---

6. Reform, Growth and China's Return

After decades of relative isolation under Mao Zedong, China began major economic reforms under Deng Xiaoping from 1978 onwards.

These reforms opened China to global trade, foreign investment and market-oriented economic activity while maintaining Communist Party control over the political system.

The result was one of the fastest and largest economic transformations in history. Hundreds of millions of people were lifted out of poverty, industrial capacity expanded dramatically and China emerged as a major technological, financial and military power.

Today, China is widely regarded as one of the two most influential powers in the international system alongside the United States.

Economic Reform – Policies that introduced market mechanisms and international trade into China's economy from the late 1970s onwards.

---

7. Historical Memory and Contemporary China

Modern Chinese leaders frequently present contemporary policy objectives through the lens of history.

Themes such as national rejuvenation, sovereignty, self-sufficiency and overcoming the legacy of foreign domination are often linked to lessons drawn from China's long historical experience.

Whether one agrees with current Chinese policies or not, understanding China's historical narrative helps explain how Chinese leaders view their country's role in the world and why issues such as Taiwan, national unity and economic development are treated as matters of fundamental national importance.

PART TWO

8. China's Rise: From Reform to Technological Power - overview

Part 2 - The Rise of China : Rural China → Factory China → Export China → Technology China → Military China → Global China.

The Historical Record

• Henry Kissinger and Richard Nixon opened relations with China in the early 1970s primarily to counter the Soviet Union.

• Formal diplomatic normalisation occurred under Jimmy Carter and Deng Xiaoping in 1978-79. 

• The economic transformation was driven principally by Deng's "Reform and Opening Up" programme, Special Economic Zones, export-led manufacturing, foreign investment, and the migration of hundreds of millions of workers from rural China into factories. 

• American consumers and multinational companies provided the demand and investment that accelerated China's rise, particularly after China's entry into the WTO in 2001. 

China's rise is the result of three interacting forces:

1. Chinese reforms and labour.

2. Western capital and consumer demand.

3. Globalisation and technology transfer.

The Military Story

From Beijing's perspective, military modernisation is a response to:

• The memory of the Century of Humiliation. • US alliances surrounding China. • US military forces in Japan, South Korea, Guam and elsewhere. • Taiwan-related tensions. • US technology restrictions and containment concerns.

From Washington's perspective, Chinese military expansion is viewed as a challenge to the existing regional order and a potential threat to Taiwan and US allies. Recent Pentagon assessments point to rapid Chinese naval, missile and technological growth. 

8. China's Rise: From Reform to Technological Power

China's rise in the twenty-first century emerged from the convergence of Chinese reforms, Western investment, global trade and technological progress.

Following the opening of relations between China and the United States in the 1970s, Deng Xiaoping launched a programme of reform and opening-up. Special Economic Zones attracted foreign capital, while hundreds of millions of workers moved from rural areas into expanding industrial cities.

Western companies gained access to abundant labour and rapidly growing production capacity. Consumers in Europe and North America gained access to inexpensive manufactured goods. China gained investment, technology, industrial know-how and export earnings.

Over the following four decades, China experienced one of the fastest economic transformations in human history. It became the world's largest manufacturing nation, a leading trading power and a major centre of technological innovation.

The first phase of development focused on low-cost manufacturing. The second phase focused on infrastructure. China built the world's largest high-speed rail network, modern ports, airports, power systems and digital communications networks. The third phase focuses on advanced technology, including electric vehicles, batteries, robotics, artificial intelligence, aerospace, biotechnology and semiconductors.

Today China leads the world in several industrial sectors and files more patents annually than any other country. Chinese companies increasingly compete at the technological frontier rather than simply manufacturing products designed elsewhere.

Military modernisation has accompanied this economic transformation. Chinese leaders argue that a stronger military is necessary to protect sovereignty, secure trade routes, prevent a repetition of the Century of Humiliation and respond to perceived containment by rival powers. Critics view the same military expansion as a challenge to the existing international order. Both interpretations influence contemporary geopolitical debates.

For many Chinese leaders, the ultimate objective is not merely economic growth but national rejuvenation: restoring China to a position of prosperity, security and international influence comparable to that enjoyed during earlier periods of Chinese history.

Reform and Opening Up - Economic reforms launched from 1978 that integrated China into the global economy.

National Rejuvenation - The idea that China is overcoming the legacy of foreign domination and restoring its historical strength and status.

Technological Frontier - The most advanced level of scientific, industrial and technological development.

References

Ray Dalio, Principled Perspectives, June 2026.

The Search for Modern China

The Cambridge History of China

The Art of War

Read More

IRAN NEW DEFENDER OF AMERICAN INTERESTS IN WEST ASIA

IRAN NEW DEFENDER OF AMERICAN INTERESTS IN WEST ASIA

Overview

On 17 June 2026, after months of war, blockade and brinkmanship, the United States and Iran signed a 14-point Memorandum of Understanding. The Strait of Hormuz reopens. The naval blockade lifts within 30 days. Up to $100 billion in frozen Iranian assets becomes available. A $300 billion reconstruction plan is to be built with regional partners. Sanctions are on a path to termination, contingent on a final deal within 60 days, itself to be endorsed by binding UN Security Council resolution.

Most analysts are reading the document for what it does to Iran's economy and to the oil market. Fair enough - both matter. But the document is also a text, in the way Joseph Campbell taught us to read texts: as the surface expression of a much older structural pattern. And read that way, the MOU is not really about Iran at all. It interestingly allows us to see this story as one where Iran is being written into a new role as Defender of American Interests in West Asia, replacing a failed Israel. Iran also offers the advantage of a pristine market with unmatched resources and consumer population untouched for 47 years.

The pattern Campbell described

Campbell's Hero's Journey runs through a recognisable sequence of figures: the weakness that traps the hero in ordinary life, the demon that weakness curdles into, the protector who does not slay the demon for the hero but equips the hero to face it, and the transformation that follows. The detail people skip past is that demon and protector are not fixed roles. They are functions that a story assigns and reassigns as the plot requires. The dragon of one chapter can become the guide of the next, if the story's needs change and someone is willing to write it that way.

That is precisely what happened in Washington this week, except the author is a superpower and the manuscript is a memorandum of understanding.

What makes this geopolitical moment feel decisive rather than merely a 39th tactical move is when the story's functions finally match the facts on the ground. But of course this could all be a Minsk-type trap for Iran.

The Minsk analogy — a framework designed to look like resolution while buying time for the other side to rearm. Iran's hardliners are certainly reading it that way, and they have 47 years of evidence for their scepticism.

Israel: the rising power that exhausted its role

For two decades, Israel occupied the protector function in America's Middle East story: the regional partner whose threat assessment Washington adopted as its own, whose intelligence and strikes did the work US policymakers wanted done without US fingerprints, whose enemies became, by extension, American enemies. That arrangement reached its operational peak in the February 2026 war — joint US-Israeli strikes, a campaign with the explicit ambition of breaking Iran's nuclear infrastructure and possibly its regime.

It did not deliver a clean result. It delivered a 14-point memorandum that Israel was not shown until after it was substantially settled, and reportedly continued not seeing for some time after that. Netanyahu's own coalition and opposition are now united in calling the war's outcome a strategic failure, his domestic position has become an open question ahead of autumn elections, and a former prime minister has said in public what Israeli officials have been saying anonymously: Iran emerged stronger, Israel emerged weaker. Whatever one thinks of the merits, that is the protector function visibly failing to protect the thing the story needed protected — stable, cheap transit through Hormuz, a contained Iran, an American position in the region that didn't require permanent military overwatch.

A protector who cannot deliver protection stops being cast as the protector. That is not a moral judgment. It is just how the role works in any story, mythic or geopolitical.

Iran: the demon being recast

Here is the move almost nobody in the commentary is naming, because it inverts forty-five years of received categorisation. The MOU does not just de-escalate. It assigns Iran a new function in the story. Iran becomes the guarantor of free transit through Hormuz, in active dialogue with Oman and the Gulf states on the strait's future administration. Iran becomes the recipient of a $300 billion American-coordinated reconstruction plan — not a punished adversary, but a project America is now invested in succeeding. Iran becomes the counterparty whose "good behaviour," in the words of one US official, is rewarded on a dial, not a switch — meaning Washington has committed itself to a relationship that continues, that requires tending, that has stakes in continuing to work.

None of that is friendship. It is something more useful than friendship: function. America's interest in the Gulf — open shipping lanes, contained nuclear risk, a check on chaos that disrupts energy markets and currency flows — increasingly requires Iranian cooperation to deliver, and Washington has just put $300 billion and a UN-endorsed deal architecture behind making that cooperation durable. The demon has been handed the protector's job description. Whether Iran performs the role well is a separate, open question — and Israeli officials are right that the missile programme, the proxy network and the regime's durability are all unresolved. But the role has been offered, and Tehran has signed for it.

Why this is the part everyone is missing

The analyst consensus I'm seeing frets that Iran "rises to become a fourth global power." That framing assumes Iran is acting alone, accumulating power against American interests. It misses that the more consequential rise here is being engineered, not resisted, by Washington. A power that the United States needs and is actively building up to perform a function for it is a fundamentally different geopolitical object than a power rising in defiance of the United States. Saudi Arabia, since the 1940s, has been the textbook case of the former. Iran, as of this week, has been handed the application.

This is also why the Lebanon clause matters more than its brief mention suggests. The MOU folds Israel's war in Lebanon into the same ceasefire architecture, over Israeli objections about freedom of action. That is not incidental housekeeping. It is the new protector being given authority over the old protector's remaining theatre of operations — Iran's position on Hezbollah and Lebanon now sits inside the framework America is building, while Israel's position sits outside the room where the framework was written.

The economics: what a 90 million-person market unlocked looks like

Set the mythic frame aside for a moment and look at the balance sheet, because this is where the thesis stops being interpretive and starts being investable. Iran has roughly 90 million people, a young and reasonably well-educated population, a domestic engineering and manufacturing base built under decades of sanctions pressure (which forces self-reliance the way nothing else does), the second-largest natural gas reserves on the planet, and oil infrastructure that has been running under sanctions constraint rather than capacity constraint. Layer on $100 billion in unfrozen assets, a $300 billion reconstruction commitment, and a sanctions-termination pathway, and you have the outline of one of the largest single-country reopening trades available anywhere in the world economy — bigger, in raw addressable-market terms, than anything else currently on offer in emerging markets.

Reconstruction capital flows first into energy infrastructure, ports, and the Hormuz transit and demining work the MOU itself specifies. Behind that comes telecoms, healthcare, consumer goods and financial services serving a population that has been cut off from global supply chains for most of two generations and has pent-up demand to show for it. None of this happens on the original 60-day clock — the nuclear question is still open, the "minimum methodology" for down-blending enriched material is unresolved, and Israel's continued operations in Lebanon are a live spoiler risk to the whole architecture. But the direction of travel, and the scale of capital Washington has now committed to that direction, is the signal worth pricing.

The closing irony

It is worth sitting for a moment with the country that doesn't get this treatment. Russia has comparable resource depth, a comparable case for reconstruction-led growth once a settlement exists, and no equivalent path on offer from its principal antagonists. Europe, unlike Washington with Iran, shows no sign of being willing to write Moscow into a protector role at any price, on any timeline, however reluctantly. Whether that reflects sounder judgment about Russia or simply a different story being told is a question for another post. But the contrast is a useful reminder that what looks like geopolitical reality is often, underneath, a choice about which character gets cast in which part.

The Minsk objection mentioned above is serious. But in the case of Russia, Minsk cost NATO nothing if it failed. This Iran deal has already cost Washington something that can't be clawed back - its posture towards Israel, now visibly subordinated to a framework Israel didn't write and wasn't shown.... and Trump has made himself a heap of enemies by signing this MoM (memo of misunderstanding).

Reality Check

Prof Pape says there is no graceful way out of the escalation trap for America in its conflict with Iran, but ...

The truth about the Iran deal that no one seems to have noticed (perhaps for good reason and it's me missing something) is that this is a classic case of demon-transformed-into protector - America is replacing a failed Israel with a winning Iran. 

America gets two things:

- a new and competent protector of its interests in the Gulf ;

- and a far more monetisable market of over 90 million people, with a work force that is skilled in Engineering and Technology, and a land full of resources, fueled by the return of its frozen assets and the lifting of sanctions.

It's a great deal though it relies on

- Iran following the American lead & breaking with its allies; and

- the neocon hardline zionists in Washington n Tel Aviv "shutting their clappy".

Read More

SLOWING LIQUIDITY

17 June 2026

Overview

The Liquidity Tide Is Slowing

Most investors focus on the level of liquidity. The smarter question is whether liquidity is accelerating or decelerating.

Global liquidity continues to rise, but the rate of increase is slowing. Markets price the change in momentum, not the absolute level. That shift is already producing familiar late-cycle signals: strong commodity performance, narrowing market breadth and a bearish flattening yield curve.

The reason is simple. Money is leaving financial assets and flowing into the real economy. That supports growth, investment and corporate earnings, but it also removes some of the fuel that previously drove asset prices higher.

Historically, this has been the transition period between speculation and turbulence.

For investors, the implication is not panic but repositioning. Real assets, precious metals, energy, resource equities and other monetary inflation hedges tend to outperform when liquidity growth slows and debt monetisation becomes the preferred policy response.

The liquidity tide is still coming in.

It is simply no longer rising as fast as before.

 the liquidity tide is still coming in - late-cycle signals, debt dynamics, and capital rotation into real assets. Know where the capital is flowing to and get there before it arrives.

Glossary

Bearish Flattening Yield Curve

• This is a market condition where:
  • Long-term bond yields fall faster than short-term yields, or
  • Short-term yields rise while long-term yields fall
• The result is a flattening of the yield curve (the gap between long and short rates narrows) combined with a bearish signal for growth assets, especially equities.

The bond market is signalling that future monetary policy will need to be easier than currently priced. Note Kevin Warsh threatens to raise the policy rate to curb inflation.

Yield curve – the line plotting government bond yields across different maturities (e.g. 2-year vs 10-year).
Flattening – a reduction in the spread between short and long-term yields.
Bearish – expectations of economic slowdown, tightening conditions, or risk asset weakness.

This needs a bit more explanation, which is offered at the end of this piece...

1. THE LIQUIDITY TIDE IS SLOWING

There is a distinction that many investors miss, and missing it can be costly.

Global liquidity continues to rise in absolute terms. Recent estimates place it at around US$193 trillion. However, markets do not primarily react to the level of liquidity. They react to the rate of change.

That rate of change is now slowing.

The implication is significant. A liquidity environment that is still expanding, but expanding more slowly, tends to favour a rotation away from financial assets and towards real assets. Within the real asset universe, the greatest beneficiaries are often those most sensitive to monetary inflation.

The direction of the tide matters more than the height of the water.

Glossary

Liquidity - The availability of money and credit within the financial system.

Rate of Change - The speed at which a variable is increasing or decreasing.

Real Assets - Physical or tangible assets such as commodities, property and natural resources.

---

2. WHERE WE ARE IN THE CYCLE

According to Michael Howell of CrossBorder Capital, the current phase is the speculation stage of the liquidity cycle.

The description is apt.

Artificial intelligence, semiconductors and robotics have generated extraordinary returns. Yet the broader market has not participated equally. Leadership has become increasingly concentrated. Market breadth has narrowed while valuations have expanded.

Historically, this combination has often appeared late in a cycle.

Volatility is beginning to rise. Market leadership is becoming narrower. Expectations have become elevated.

Trees do not grow to the sky.

The phase that has historically followed is what Howell describes as the turbulence stage. During this period, liquidity begins to drain more rapidly and the direction of risk assets often reverses.

That transition has not fully arrived, but the prudent time to prepare is before it becomes obvious.

Three conditions currently support the late-cycle interpretation.

First, commodity markets have begun to outperform. This is consistent with liquidity moving away from financial markets and into the real economy.

Second, yield curves are experiencing bearish flattening. Long-term yields are rising, but short-term yields are rising even faster, compressing the spread between them.

Third, market breadth continues to narrow despite resilient headline indices.

All three conditions are now visible.

Glossary

Market Breadth - The proportion of shares participating in a market move.

Bearish Flattening - A yield curve compression caused by short-term interest rates rising faster than long-term rates.

Yield Curve - A graph showing government bond yields across different maturities.

---

3. WHY IS LIQUIDITY SLOWING IF CENTRAL BANKS REMAIN LOOSE?

At first glance, the slowdown appears puzzling.

Most major central banks are not aggressively tightening monetary policy. Yet financial liquidity is clearly decelerating.

The explanation is straightforward.

Money must always be somewhere.

What appears to be happening is a migration of capital away from financial assets and into the real economy.

That migration is supporting stronger-than-expected economic activity, particularly in the United States.

Nominal GDP growth of 7 to 8 per cent is entirely plausible when considering:

• Massive AI-related capital expenditure

• Persistent fiscal deficits

• Expanding energy export revenues

This shift benefits commodities and many operating businesses.

However, it is not automatically positive for financial asset valuations.

For years, Wall Street received the first wave of liquidity. Asset prices rose well ahead of underlying earnings.

Now the process is reversing.

The earnings are beginning to appear, but the liquidity that previously expanded valuation multiples is increasingly flowing elsewhere.

Main Street is receiving its turn.

That transition is rarely smooth.

The key principle is sequencing.

Liquidity leads economic activity.

Financial markets rise first because money arrives first.

The real economy improves later because investment eventually creates output, employment and profits.

When capital leaves financial markets and enters productive activity, earlier optimism becomes justified. However, the fuel for further multiple expansion begins to diminish.

Glossary

Nominal GDP - Economic growth measured without adjusting for inflation.

P/E Ratio - Price divided by earnings, a common valuation measure.

Multiple Expansion - Rising valuations caused by investors paying more for each unit of earnings.

---

4. THE GLOBAL DEBT MACHINE

The backdrop to the liquidity story is unprecedented debt accumulation.

Across much of the developed world, capital markets increasingly function as debt refinancing systems rather than engines of productive investment.

Some estimates suggest that roughly four out of every five primary market transactions globally are debt rollovers rather than new financing.

Liquidity and debt form a closed loop.

Debt requires liquidity for refinancing.

Liquidity is increasingly created through collateralised lending.

According to World Bank data, approximately 75 to 80 per cent of global lending is collateral-based.

The principal collateral consists of government bonds and property.

The system therefore depends on maintaining confidence in both.

Should debt markets become unstable, liquidity can contract rapidly.

Historically, there has been only one durable solution to excessive sovereign indebtedness.

Monetisation.

Governments rarely default outright.

Instead, they reduce the real burden of debt through inflation and currency dilution.

Japan demonstrated this following its post-1990 collapse through quantitative easing and prolonged monetary expansion.

China appears to be moving along a similar path after decades of debt-fuelled property investment.

Much of the resulting liquidity has flowed into gold, traditionally viewed as a store of value.

Increasingly, price discovery in gold is being influenced by Asian demand, particularly through the Shanghai market.

The United States is not exempt.

The Treasury has increasingly favoured issuing short-dated bills rather than longer-term bonds. Roughly half of federal debt now matures within two years.

Weekly refinancing requirements approach US$329 billion.

Banks willingly absorb this debt because expanding fiscal deficits simultaneously create deposits that require income-producing assets.

The result is a form of ongoing monetisation.

Milton Friedman would have recognised the implications immediately.

Glossary

Debt Monetisation - Financing government debt through money creation.

Collateralised Lending - Lending secured against assets.

Quantitative Easing - Central bank asset purchases designed to increase liquidity.

---

5. THE SUPPRESSION OF VOLATILITY

One of the least discussed aspects of today's system is the active management of bond market volatility.

The key indicator is the MOVE Index, often described as the bond market's equivalent of the VIX.

A growing share of Treasury demand now comes from hedge funds operating highly leveraged basis trades.

These trades involve purchasing physical bonds while simultaneously selling futures contracts, profiting from small pricing differences.

The strategy works only when volatility remains low.

If volatility spikes, leverage must be reduced and demand disappears.

The implications extend beyond hedge funds.

Collateral values throughout the financial system depend on volatility assumptions.

Low volatility means lower collateral haircuts and a larger collateral multiplier.

This supports greater lending and greater liquidity.

High volatility has the opposite effect.

Liquidity contracts.

Treasury buyback programmes appear designed, at least in part, to support market functioning by replacing less liquid bonds with newly issued securities.

Whether this can continue indefinitely remains uncertain.

The arithmetic is becoming increasingly difficult.

If nominal GDP is growing at 7 to 8 per cent while ten-year Treasury yields remain around 5 per cent, long-duration investors are accepting negative real returns.

That imbalance may eventually require adjustment.

Glossary

MOVE Index - A measure of expected US Treasury market volatility.

Basis Trade - A leveraged strategy exploiting price differences between bonds and futures.

Collateral Multiplier - The amount of lending supported by a given quantity of collateral.

---

6. WHAT THIS MEANS FOR INVESTORS

The broad implication is a gradual rotation away from financial assets and towards real assets.

Understanding the difference between monetary inflation and consumer price inflation is crucial.

Consumer inflation reflects both monetary factors and real-world production costs.

For decades, powerful deflationary forces such as globalisation, cheap energy and technological productivity offset much of the inflation generated by monetary expansion.

As a result, financial assets substantially outperformed consumer purchasing power.

Gold performed even better.

Since 2000, gold has risen approximately fifteen-fold, compared with roughly six to seven times for major US equity indices.

If US federal debt continues expanding at 7 to 8 per cent annually, as projected by the Congressional Budget Office, investors require returns above that level merely to preserve purchasing power measured against monetary dilution.

Historically, the assets most capable of achieving this have included:

• Precious metals

• Prime residential property

• Energy and resource companies

• Food / agricultural

• Select cryptocurrencies (dangerous)

Within commodities, the traditional sequence often begins with precious metals, followed by industrial metals and finally agricultural products.

There are signs that this progression is underway.

Oil also appears historically inexpensive relative to gold.

The long-term gold-to-oil ratio has averaged around 20. Current pricing implies substantial upside - $200? - for oil if that relationship reverts towards historical norms.

Energy producers and mining companies provide leveraged exposure to these themes.

A further possibility deserves consideration.

If inflationary pressures continue building, the Federal Reserve may ultimately be forced to raise interest rates despite widespread expectations of easing.

Such an outcome remains controversial, but it cannot be dismissed.

And finally, geopolitical. Middle East and Ukraine rebuilding contracts anyone? Iran, former demon, is being recognised and will be made into the new Protector Of West Asia... with all its resources, technological and engineering capabilities, plus a market of 90+m consumers, once sanctions are off and frozen assets restored. Pity Europe cannot see the same for Russia.

Glossary

Monetary Inflation - Expansion of the money supply that reduces currency purchasing power.

Consumer Price Inflation - Rising prices paid by households for goods and services.

Gold-to-Oil Ratio - A valuation measure comparing the relative prices of gold and crude oil.

---

7. CONCLUSION

The immediate challenge is not prediction.

It is context.

Markets move through identifiable liquidity cycles. Understanding the phase of the cycle matters more than forecasting the exact timing of every turn.

The evidence increasingly suggests that the speculation phase is maturing and the turbulence phase is approaching.

That does not guarantee an imminent market decline.

It does suggest that the balance of probabilities is shifting.

In such an environment, portfolio construction becomes more important than market forecasts.

A diversified core allocation tilted towards monetary inflation hedges, real assets and late-cycle sectors appears increasingly rational.

The liquidity tide has not yet gone out.

But it is no longer rising as quickly as before.

For investors, that distinction may prove to be one of the most important developments of the coming years.

NOTE ON FLATTENING YIELD CURVE

Did you spot an apparent contradiction? - long-term yields will be lower not higher than yields today, though we are in aperiod of higher inflation. Surely yields will have to be higher for longer?

This apparent contradiction is exactly why yield curve analysis can be confusing.

The key point is that long-term bond yields are driven by three things - not only by inflation, but by expectations of future growth and expected future short-term interest rates.

If investors believe that:

• Inflation is currently high, and

• Kevin Warsh central bank (or any other CB) may raise rates further in the short term (as is currently expected)

• Those higher rates will eventually slow the economy,

• > then investors may conclude that rates will have to be cut later.

• Higher rates will raise the dollar, making gold - which has no yield - less attractive

In that case they sell some gold perhaps, to buy long-dated bonds today, locking in current yields before future rate cuts arrive. The increased demand pushes bond prices up, long-term yields down, gold down, equities down.

So the market is effectively saying:

"We think policy may become tighter in the near term, but so tight that it ultimately forces easier policy in the future."

A simplified example:

• 2-year Treasury yield = 5.0%

• 10-year Treasury yield = 4.5%

The 10-year yield is lower because investors expect that over the next decade the average policy rate will be below today's 5%.

The bond market is not saying inflation is harmless. It is saying that future growth will be weak enough that inflation and interest rates will eventually fall.

A useful way to think about it is:

• Inflation risk → pushes yields up.

• Recession risk → pushes yields down.

• In a bearish flattening, recession fears are beginning to outweigh inflation fears at the long end of the curve.

That is why long bonds (price up = yield down) can rally even while central bankers are still talking tough on inflation. The market is looking beyond the next few meetings and pricing the entire economic cycle.

Read More

INFRANOMICS ON THE INFLATION DATA THAT CRASHED THE MARKETS ON 10 JUNE 2026

11 June 2026

LITA | Living in the Air | 11 June 2026

OVERVIEW On 10 June 2026, fresh US Consumer Price Index data landed and the equity market sold off sharply - the S&P 500 down 1.2%, the Nasdaq 1.6%, the Magnificent Seven 1.9%. This post unpacks what the data actually said, why the methodology matters as much as the number, what the commodity and oil curve are pricing in, and what it means for real purchasing power, Fed policy, and the broader macro trade. This is not a routine inflation print. It is a signal.

Red Hot: What the June 2026 Inflation Data Really Tells Us

I. What Is the CPI - and Why Does the Definition Matter?

---

The market reaction on 10 June was immediate and unambiguous. The S&P 500 fell 1.2 percent. The Nasdaq fell 1.6 percent. The Magnificent Seven - the small cluster of technology companies that have for years carried the index - dropped 1.9 percent. Before asking what the number means, it is worth asking what the number actually is.

The CPI does not stand for Consumer Price Inflation. It stands for the Consumer Price Index - a basket of goods and services compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, intended to represent what the average American household spends money on. The BLS updates the composition of that basket over time: what Americans bought in 1914 differs substantially from what they buy in 2026. Within the basket, different items carry different weightings. Shelter, measured through a construct called Owner's Equivalent Rent, carries one of the largest weights - and is, as we shall see, a source of ongoing controversy.

The number you hear on the evening news - the "inflation rate" - is not the index itself. It is the year-on-year rate of change of the index. This distinction matters. The index measures the price level. The inflation rate measures how quickly that level is rising. Prices, as a general historical matter, have only ever moved up and to the right. The question is always: how fast?

"The inflation rate is not the price level. It is the speed at which the price level is rising. The price level does not fall. This is not an accident — it is a feature of debt-based monetary systems."

From 1980 to 2020 - a forty-year span - US prices rose at a remarkably consistent annual rate of approximately 2.5 percent. That trend is now decisively broken. The current price level sits roughly 19 percent above the long-run trend rate of growth. To understand why that matters structurally rather than cyclically, consider compounding. Suppose the CPI index stands at 100. A 10 percent inflation rate takes it to 110. The following year, the same 10 percent rate does not add 10 points — it adds 11, taking the index to 121. The year after, it adds 12. The starting point rises with each pass. Inflation is not arithmetic; it is exponential. Its burden on ordinary households compounds exactly as a debt does.

MECHANISM: The Compounding Price Level

Index at 100 → +10% → 110 → +10% → 121 → +10% → 133.1. The same rate of inflation inflicts an ever-larger absolute increase on the price level because the base rises each period. After ten years of 10% inflation, the original basket costs 2.59 times what it cost at the start. The purchasing power of fixed wages or savings erodes correspondingly.

The inverse of the CPI - the purchasing power of the dollar - traces a curve that approaches zero asymptotically. It does not crash to zero in a straight line; it declines in a shape that accelerates at the margin. Monetarists track this differently: they define inflation as the rate of growth of the money supply. During 2021, M2 - the broad money supply - grew at a peak annual rate of approximately 27 percent. By the simple logic of supply and demand, if the supply of money doubles overnight and the supply of Ferraris does not, the price of Ferraris rises. That mechanism propagated through the US economy over the following five years, producing the great inflation of 2021–2026.

GLOSSARY — Chapter I

Consumer Price Index (CPI) — A weighted basket of goods and services compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to track changes in the price level faced by the average US household. The reported "inflation rate" is the year-on-year percentage change in this index, not the index level itself.

Owner's Equivalent Rent (OER) — The BLS's (US Bureau of Labor Statistics) estimate of what a homeowner would theoretically pay to rent their own home. It is not a market transaction; it is a survey-derived imputation. Because it carries heavy weight in the CPI basket, critics argue it systematically understates or distorts shelter inflation relative to actual housing costs.

M2 (Broad Money Supply) — A measure of the money stock including currency in circulation, checking deposits, savings deposits, and money market funds. Monetarist economists treat the rate of growth of M2 as the primary driver of inflation over the medium term.

Compounding Inflation — The mathematical consequence of applying a percentage rate of change to a rising base. Each year's inflation applies to a larger starting level, so the absolute price increase grows even when the percentage rate is unchanged. This is structurally equivalent to compound interest in reverse from the perspective of purchasing power.

II. Measuring the Same Thing Three Ways — CPI, PPI, and PCE

---

There is no single authoritative inflation number. There are three primary indices, each tracking the same underlying reality through a slightly different lens.

CPI — the measure that drove Tuesday's market reaction — tracks prices at the consumer level. PPI, the Producer Price Index, tracks prices at the level of the firm: what companies are paying for inputs before those costs are passed along to end consumers. PCE, the Personal Consumption Expenditure index, is the measure the Federal Reserve actually uses when setting policy. All three are methodologically similar; they differ in their precise basket definitions, their treatment of substitution, and their weighting structures.

The relationship between PPI and CPI contains one of the more useful leading indicators available. Firms feel inflation before households do, because input cost increases take time to flow through supply chains and pricing decisions into the retail environment. PPI typically leads CPI by one to two months. On Tuesday's data, that relationship is pointing upward: the PMI surveys - purchasing manager indices, which track what companies are actually paying for inputs - show the prices-paid component for services at the highest level since 2022. The manufacturing equivalent dipped slightly but remains near 2022 levels. PPI is elevated. The CPI should follow.

"PPI leads CPI by one to two months. The PMIs are flashing amber. The direction of travel is not ambiguous."

There are two ways PPI inflation fails to translate into CPI inflation. The first is margin compression: the firm absorbs the cost increase rather than passing it on, accepting a reduction in profitability. The second is demand destruction: the firm attempts to pass it on, but consumers, already stretched, refuse to pay. Consumption falls rather than prices rising. During recessions, this dynamic can push CPI negative - as it briefly did in 2008, when the year-on-year rate touched minus 2 percent. Today, we are not in that environment. The PMIs suggest upward pressure, not compression.

PCE per capita — total personal consumption spending divided by the US population - currently stands at approximately $129,000 per person per year. Since the end of the gold standard in 1971, this per capita spending figure has outpaced the official CPI index by nearly 100 percent. Stated differently: what Americans are actually spending has risen more than twice as fast as the official price index. The gap between M2 growth and CPI over the same thirty-five-year period is even wider - M2 has outpaced official inflation by 174 percent. The CPI is not fabricated, but it is a political document as much as a statistical one, and the gap between it and lived experience is structural, not incidental.

MECHANISM: PPI → CPI Transmission

Input cost increases (PPI) are initially absorbed at the firm level. If the firm can pass them on - because demand is sufficient and the consumer has income - they appear in CPI one to two months later. If the firm cannot pass them on to consumers, the result is margin compression (negative for equities) or demand destruction (negative for growth). The PMI prices-paid component is a forward indicator of where PPI is heading, and therefore where CPI will likely follow.

NOTE: How commodity prices flow into CPI

The path from a commodity price move to a CPI print involves several stages, each with its own lag and attenuation factor.

Stage 1 — Raw commodity price. Oil, natural gas, agricultural goods, and metals trade on global markets. Their spot prices reflect supply disruption, geopolitical risk premia, and speculative positioning in real time. These are the prices that make headlines.

Stage 2 — Producer costs (PPI). Energy and raw material price increases flow immediately into the cost structure of firms - whether manufacturers running oil-heated furnaces, transport companies buying diesel, or food processors buying grain. The Producer Price Index captures this. Because firms are larger and more price-sensitive buyers than households, the signal appears here first.

Stage 3 — Consumer prices (CPI). Firms facing higher input costs must decide whether to absorb the hit (margin compression) or pass it on through higher consumer prices. If they pass it on, the increase appears in CPI with a one-to-two-month lag. The magnitude of pass-through depends on demand conditions: if consumers have money and few alternatives, the full increase is transmitted; if they are financially stretched, the firm eats part of it.

Stage 4 — Second-round effects. Energy cost increases do not stop at the pump. They raise the cost of every good that is transported, manufactured using energy-intensive processes, or produced by workers demanding wage compensation for higher living costs. These second-round effects are slower to appear in CPI but are often more persistent than the initial commodity shock.

A more complete inflation pipeline looks like this:

Commodity Prices

↓

ISM / PMI Prices Paid

↓

PPI (Producer Price Index)

↓

Intermediate Demand Prices

↓

Finished Goods Prices

↓

Wholesale Prices

↓

Retail Prices

↓

CPI / PCE

Today's context. WTI crude oil has risen sharply since the outbreak of the Middle East conflict, and the futures curve - as discussed in Chapter IV - is now pricing in elevated oil for the medium term. The BLS does publish an energy sub-component within CPI, and it is already showing up as a positive contributor. The lag dynamics mean the full impact of oil prices at current levels has not yet been fully reflected in the headline CPI number. On the current trajectory, it will be.

GLOSSARY — Chapter II

Producer Price Index (PPI) — Measures changes in the prices received by domestic producers for their output. Because firms experience input cost increases before passing them to consumers, PPI leads CPI by approximately one to two months and functions as a forward indicator of consumer inflation.

Personal Consumption Expenditure Index (PCE) — The Federal Reserve's preferred measure of inflation. Compiled by the Bureau of Economic Analysis rather than the BLS. Differs from CPI primarily in that it adjusts for consumer substitution (when consumers switch to cheaper alternatives) and uses a broader population base. Generally prints slightly below CPI.

Purchasing Manager Index (PMI) — Prices Paid Component — A survey-based indicator in which purchasing managers at companies report whether input prices rose, fell, or were unchanged relative to the prior month. The prices-paid sub-component is a real-time leading indicator of PPI and, with a further lag, CPI.

Margin Compression — The reduction in a company's profit margin when input costs rise but the firm cannot or does not raise output prices equivalently. Margin compression is bearish for equity earnings but can temporarily suppress CPI by absorbing cost increases at the corporate level.

Demand Destruction — The process by which rising prices reduce consumption, as households find they cannot afford to maintain previous spending levels. When demand destruction is severe, it caps or reverses price increases - but at the cost of economic contraction.

III. Inside the Print — What Is Actually Driving Inflation?

---

The headline CPI number for May - the data released on 10 June - came in with the highest year-on-year reading since May 2023. The core reading, which strips out food and energy to provide a read on underlying domestic inflation pressures, came in at 2.9 percent. The Fed's target is 2 percent. It is worth noting that the Fed has now been above its own 2 percent target for 63 consecutive months. The target itself has an almost comically contingent origin: it was not derived from economic theory, but from an offhand comment on a New Zealand television programme in the 1980s, subsequently adopted by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand and then by the Federal Reserve. Its authority is entirely institutional rather than empirical.

Within the headline print, the principal drivers are energy and services - not goods. This matters for the policy debate. The tariff-related inflation narrative that has dominated discussion since early 2025 is not visible in the core goods component, which barely registers and remains far below the levels seen in 2021–2023. The inflation being experienced now is not a tariff story. It is an energy story and a services story.

On the goods side, May actually registered the first month-on-month decline since May 2025 — technically deflation within that sub-basket. Within services, transportation services dragged the core print down by 0.6 percentage points, driven by an unexpected 1.7 percent month-on-month decline in car insurance. This is statistically anomalous. Car insurance premiums have, by most observable measures, roughly tripled over the past two years. A sudden 1.7 percent decline in the official index sits awkwardly alongside that lived reality and invites scrutiny of the measurement methodology.

Shelter is the most consequential component. It carries the largest weighting in the CPI basket and, after a period of softening, now appears to have bottomed and resumed its upward trajectory. Shelter inflation re-accelerating is structurally significant: it is persistent, it is not supply-shock driven, and it is not something the Fed can meaningfully address through rate increases without simultaneously crushing the housing market and the broader economy.

Medical care commodities offer a countervailing signal. Pharmaceutical drug prices have now fallen in five consecutive months - genuine deflation in a category where it is not merely welcome but urgently needed. Medical equipment and supplies similarly show no inflationary pressure. Against the backdrop of the broader print, these are isolated points of relief rather than a systemic trend.

Electricity is moving in the opposite direction. The cost per kilowatt-hour is up 45 percent since 2020 and is rising parabolically. The data centre build-out - driven by AI infrastructure demand - is a material contributor. Energy demand from computing is not a future consideration; it is already embedded in the inflation data.

"The inflation being experienced in June 2026 is not a tariff story. Goods are almost irrelevant. This is an energy and services inflation - and shelter is re-accelerating."

GLOSSARY — Chapter III

Core CPI — CPI calculated after removing food and energy prices, which are considered more volatile. Core CPI is intended to reveal the underlying structural rate of domestic inflation, stripped of transitory commodity-driven noise. The May print came in at 2.9 percent - well above the Fed's 2 percent target.

Headline CPI — The full CPI including food and energy. More volatile than core CPI but more representative of what households actually spend. The May headline print reached its highest level since May 2023, driven principally by energy.

Hedonics (Hedonic Adjustment) — A BLS methodology that adjusts prices downward when a product's quality is deemed to have improved. Critics argue hedonic adjustments systematically understate inflation by treating capability improvements (e.g., a faster computer) as price reductions, even when the actual cash outlay has risen.

Substitution Bias — A known distortion in fixed-basket price indices. When the price of one good rises, consumers switch to cheaper alternatives. A fixed basket does not capture this substitution and therefore overstates inflation - or alternatively, by changing the basket to reflect substitution, the index is criticised for understating the real cost of maintaining a fixed standard of living.

Shelter Inflation / OER — The single largest component of CPI. Measured primarily through Owner's Equivalent Rent - a survey asking homeowners what they would charge to rent their own home. This metric lags actual market rent changes by 12–18 months, meaning shelter's weight in CPI both understates rising rents on the way up and understates falling rents on the way down.

IV. The Oil Curve Is Speaking - And the Market Is Only Just Beginning to Listen

---

The energy component of Tuesday's CPI print is a lagging reflection of what the oil futures market has been signalling for months. WTI crude - the US benchmark - has risen approximately 20 percent in the wake of the Middle East conflict. Before the outbreak of hostilities, prompt WTI was trading around $65. The May 2027 futures contract is now pricing WTI at approximately $77 - a recognition by the forward market that this conflict is neither short nor easily resolved.

The structure of the crude futures curve tells a more precise story than the spot price alone. In the early stages of the conflict, the curve was sharply backwardated: short-dated contracts traded far above longer-dated contracts, reflecting an assumption that disruption would be temporary and that prices would revert. That assumption has progressively been unwound. The further out on the curve you look - March 2027, May 2027 - the more those forward prices have risen. The market is pricing in structural elevation, not a transitory spike.

On Tuesday evening, there was a further escalation. The conflict does not appear to be approaching resolution. The oil market has been slow to price in permanence - it typically is - but the gradual steepening of the forward curve represents a collective revision of probability. Each uptick in the longer-dated contracts is the market extending its estimate of how long elevated oil prices will persist.

MECHANISM: Backwardation, Contango, and What the Curve Is Telling You

Backwardation — short-dated prices above long-dated prices — signals that markets expect supply tightness to ease. Contango — long-dated above short-dated — suggests supply tightness is expected to persist or worsen. The current WTI curve, with longer-dated contracts moving up toward $77, is consistent with a market revising toward persistent supply disruption rather than temporary shock. For inflation forecasters, this matters: if oil stays elevated, energy CPI contributions will not reverse. They will compound into second-round effects throughout the services and goods economy.

The implication for inflation is direct. Energy's contribution to headline CPI was near zero or mildly negative for much of 2024. It is now a positive contributor, and on the current forward curve, that contribution will persist. The data centre electricity demand story reinforces this: the US grid is absorbing a sustained increase in baseload demand from AI infrastructure. Oil, natural gas, and electricity are all heading in the same direction. The Fed's preferred practice of stripping energy out of the core reading provides analytical clarity on structural domestic inflation, but it does not mean energy inflation is economically inert for households or for the trajectory of the headline number.

GLOSSARY — Chapter IV

WTI Crude (West Texas Intermediate) — The primary US crude oil benchmark. WTI is a light, sweet crude traded on the NYMEX. The prompt (front-month) futures contract is the price most commonly quoted in financial media. The forward curve — all the contracts at various future expiry dates — reveals market expectations about future supply and demand conditions.

Backwardation — A futures market structure in which near-term contracts trade at higher prices than longer-dated contracts. Typical in commodity markets experiencing acute supply disruption, and usually interpreted as a temporary condition. The unwinding of backwardation in the WTI curve — with longer-dated contracts rising toward short-dated levels — signals a market revising its view of disruption from temporary to structural.

Contango — The opposite of backwardation: longer-dated futures prices exceed near-term prices. Common in well-supplied markets where storage costs are priced in. In crude oil, contango typically signals market expectations of continued or worsening supply tightness at a future point.

Second-Round Inflation Effects — Price increases that propagate through the economy after an initial commodity shock. If oil rises and transport costs increase, every good that is shipped becomes more expensive. If workers face higher energy bills at home, they demand wage increases, which raise firm costs, which are passed on in prices. Second-round effects are slower to appear in inflation data than the initial shock but are typically more persistent.

V. The Policy Trap - What the Fed Cannot Fix

---

Following the May CPI print, the market is now fully pricing in one Federal Reserve rate hike over the next twelve months, with a slight lean toward a second. This is, in the analytical framework of the inflation being observed, precisely the wrong response.

Monetary policy - raising interest rates - operates by suppressing demand. It makes borrowing more expensive, discourages consumption and investment, and eventually slows the rate at which money circulates through the economy. This is a rational response to demand-pull inflation: inflation driven by an excess of money chasing a relatively fixed supply of goods. It is not a rational response to cost-push inflation — inflation driven by a supply-side shock that reduces the quantity of goods available regardless of demand.

Approximately 20 percent of global WTI production has been disrupted by the current Middle East conflict. No increment of interest rate increases will restore that supply. Raising rates will not bring oil production back online. It will not reduce electricity demand from data centres. It will not lower shelter costs — in fact, by raising mortgage rates, it is more likely to worsen them, as higher financing costs reduce housing supply by strangling construction.

What raising rates will do in this environment is suppress domestic demand, compress corporate margins, slow wage growth, and - over time - trigger the demand destruction that is the only mechanism by which cost-push inflation resolves in a monetary system unwilling to directly intervene in supply. The medicine works, but it works by making people poorer rather than by fixing the underlying supply disruption.

The real yield picture is already turning. Short-term real yields - the nominal rate minus inflation - are now negative: if you hold money in a money market fund, you are losing real purchasing power in absolute terms. Longer-dated bonds still carry a positive real yield: the 10-year Treasury offers approximately 0.6 percent above inflation; the 30-year offers 1.17 percent. This is a modest real return relative to the risk being taken on, but at least it is positive... unlike the short end.

"Raising rates will not reopen a blocked strait or rebuild a pipeline. It will slow demand until households can no longer afford to pay the elevated prices. That is not a solution. It is a managed recession."

The market structure on Tuesday reflected this ambiguity. Yields at the short end barely moved: the market has already priced in the rate trajectory. At the longer end, yields rose slightly, producing a modest steepening of the curve - though the broader trend over recent weeks and months has been flattening, as the market prices in the probability that the Fed will tighten into a slowing economy. The dollar-yen pair continued to melt higher, raising the probability of Bank of Japan intervention at the upcoming policy meeting. Oil was up 2 percent on the day. Volatility indices spiked, unwinding part of the dispersion trade that had been compressing equity correlations.

MECHANISM: Demand-Pull vs. Cost-Push Inflation

Demand-pull inflation arises when aggregate demand exceeds aggregate supply - too much money chasing too few goods. Rate increases suppress demand and are the appropriate tool. Cost-push inflation arises when supply is constrained - a commodity shock, a geopolitical disruption, a structural underinvestment in productive capacity. Rate increases do not address the supply constraint; they address inflation only by suppressing demand to the point where it meets the reduced supply. The cost is economic contraction. The current inflation in the United States is primarily cost-push in character. The policy toolkit is mismatched to the problem.

GLOSSARY — Chapter V

Demand-Pull Inflation — Inflation driven by excess demand relative to supply. The classic monetary inflation: too much money chasing too few goods. Responsive to interest rate increases, which reduce the purchasing power of borrowers and slow the velocity of money.

Cost-Push Inflation — Inflation driven by increases in the cost of production, typically from supply-side shocks: commodity price spikes, energy disruptions, supply chain breakdowns. Not responsive to interest rate increases in a direct sense; rates work only by inducing demand destruction, which is a slower and more economically costly mechanism.

Real Yield — The nominal yield on a bond minus the inflation rate. A positive real yield means the bondholder is earning a return above the rate of price erosion; a negative real yield means they are losing purchasing power in real terms even while receiving nominal interest payments. Short-term US real yields turned negative on the May inflation data.

Yield Curve (2-30 Spread) — The difference between short-dated and long-dated government bond yields. A steepening curve — where long yields rise relative to short yields — typically reflects rising inflation expectations or growth optimism. A flattening curve, as seen over recent months, can signal that the market expects the central bank to tighten into a slowing economy.

Dispersion Trade — A volatility arbitrage strategy that profits when individual stock volatilities are high but their correlations are low (they move independently). When macro risk events hit - as with a significant inflation print - correlations spike, equities move together, and the dispersion trade unwinds, adding to market selling pressure.

Conclusion: What This Means

---

The June 10 inflation print is not a surprise to anyone who has been watching the commodity complex, the forward oil curve, or the PMI surveys over the past three months. The market's reaction, however, suggests that equity pricing had not fully discounted what those leading indicators were signalling.

The inflation being observed in mid-2026 is not the demand-pull monetary excess of 2021. It is structurally distinct: driven by a geopolitical supply shock in energy, by the persistent re-acceleration of shelter costs, and by second-round effects now beginning to show up in services. The goods sector - the tariff narrative - is essentially absent from the data.

The Fed faces a policy environment in which the available tools are poorly matched to the problem. Rate hikes will slow the economy. They will not fix an oil supply disruption. The market is pricing in those hikes anyway, and the two-year/thirty-year curve will continue to be the instrument to watch. Negative short real yields are a silent tax on savers and money market holders. The long end, offering modest but positive real yields, remains relatively more attractive in that context.

For those positioned in physical assets - gold, energy infrastructure, industrial metals, real-yield instruments such as solid dividend plays - the May CPI print is not a surprise. It is confirmation. The rotation thesis does not require the data to deteriorate further; it simply requires it to persist. On Tuesday's evidence, there is no structural reason to expect it to do otherwise.

The author holds positions in SGLN, AUCP, AIGI, GDX, and GDXJ. This post is analytical commentary only and does not constitute investment advice. All figures sourced from public BLS releases and public futures market data as of 10–11 June 2026.

Read More